Internally generated requests are a little quirky in that they’re generated by
outside timer processes or tasks in core timers — activity that takes place
outside the SIP worker pool. However, the expectation is that any replies will
be processed (in this case, absorbed) by the SIP workers.
Asymmetric signalling is permitted in SIP, so sending from source port X while
specifying a return port of Y in the top Via hop is perfectly acceptable.
— Alex
—
Sent from mobile, with due apologies for brevity and errors.
> On Oct 29, 2020, at 3:21 PM, Noah Mehl <noahm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hey all,
>
> I’m a little stuck on an implementation of a set of dispatchers via TCP.
> There are some oddities about the behavior of the TCP source port of the
> Kamailio tcp worker/s, and maybe this is expected, but it doesn’t seem valid.
> For instance, I have a dispatcher:
>
> "RECORDS": [{
> "SET": {
> "ID": 1,
> "TARGETS": [{
> "DEST": {
> "URI":
> “sip:2.2.2.2:5060;transport=tcp",
> "FLAGS":
> "AP",
> "PRIORITY":
> 5
> }
> }]
> }
> }]
>
> But when Kamailio sends an OPTIONS keep alive, the source port for the worker
> is 33940, and not 5060 (which is the TCP listen port), as received by
> Freeswitch:
>
> recv 447 bytes from tcp/[1.1.1.1]:33940 at 18:58:24.958720:
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> OPTIONS sip:2.2.2.2:5060;transport=tcp SIP/2.0
> Via: SIP/2.0/TCP
> 1.1.1.1;branch=z9hG4bK1525.80a9e442000000000000000000000000.0
> To: <sip:2.2.2.2:5060;transport=tcp>
> From:
> <sip:inbound-kamailio-01>;tag=3c52ba62ee4c4621b9660728159919d3-cda8066f
> CSeq: 10 OPTIONS
> Call-ID: 3aa18693487268dc-2790@1.1.1.1
> Max-Forwards: 70
> Content-Length: 0
> User-Agent: kamailio (5.4.2 (x86_64/linux))
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Also, I get weird debug messages when this tcp worker is spun up
> (specifically about Resource temporarily unavailable):
>
> 11(2790) DEBUG: dispatcher [dispatch.c:3340]: ds_ping_result_helper(): probe
> all, mode DS_PROBE_ALL
> 11(2790) DEBUG: dispatcher [dispatch.c:3383]: ds_ping_set(): probing set #1,
> URI sip:2.2.2.2:5060;transport=tcp
> 11(2790) DEBUG: dispatcher [dispatch.c:3414]: ds_ping_set(): Default
> ping_from: sip:inbound-kamailio-01
> 11(2790) DEBUG: dispatcher [dispatch.c:3424]: ds_ping_set(): Default outbound
> proxy:
> 11(2790) DEBUG: tm [uac.c:450]: t_uac_prepare():
> next_hop=<sip:2.2.2.2:5060;transport=tcp>
> 11(2790) DEBUG: tm [uac.c:158]: dlg2hash(): hashid 21073
> 11(2790) DEBUG: <core> [core/tcp_main.c:1993]: tcp_send(): no open tcp
> connection found, opening new one
> 11(2790) DEBUG: <core> [core/ip_addr.c:229]: print_ip(): tcpconn_new: new tcp
> connection: 2.2.2.2
> 11(2790) DEBUG: <core> [core/tcp_main.c:1175]: tcpconn_new(): on port 5060,
> type 2, socket -1
> 11(2790) DEBUG: <core> [core/tcp_main.c:1494]: tcpconn_add(): hashes:
> 2712:0:0, 1
> 11(2790) DEBUG: <core> [core/tcp_main.c:2886]: tcpconn_1st_send(): pending
> write on new connection 0x7f24e64c1e18 sock 8 (-1/447 bytes written) (err: 11
> - Resource temporarily unavailable)
> 11(2790) DEBUG: tm [uac.c:678]: send_prepared_request_impl(): uac:
> 0x7f24e65285a8 branch: 0 to 2.2.2.2:5060
> 11(2790) DEBUG: <core> [core/onsend.c:50]: run_onsend(): required parameters
> are not available - ignoring
> 27(2806) DEBUG: <core> [core/tcp_main.c:3792]: handle_ser_child(): read
> response= 7f24e64c1e18, 5, fd 46 from 11 (2790)
> 27(2806) DEBUG: <core> [core/io_wait.h:375]: io_watch_add(): DBG:
> io_watch_add(0x56490f0f8060, 46, 2, 0x7f24e64c1e18), fd_no=37
> 27(2806) DEBUG: <core> [core/io_wait.h:782]: io_watch_chg(): DBG:
> io_watch_chg (0x56490f0f8060, 46, 0x1, 0xffffffff) fd_no=38 called
> 27(2806) DEBUG: <core> [core/io_wait.h:600]: io_watch_del(): DBG:
> io_watch_del (0x56490f0f8060, 46, -1, 0x0) fd_no=38 called
> 27(2806) DEBUG: <core> [core/tcp_main.c:4457]: handle_tcpconn_ev(): sending
> to child, events 1
> 27(2806) DEBUG: <core> [core/tcp_main.c:4127]: send2child(): selected tcp
> worker idx:0 proc:19 pid:2798 for activity on [tcp:1.1.1.1:5060],
> 0x7f24e64c1e18
> 19(2798) DEBUG: <core> [core/tcp_read.c:1749]: handle_io(): received n=8
> con=0x7f24e64c1e18, fd=8
> 19(2798) DEBUG: <core> [core/tcp_read.c:1548]: tcp_read_req():
> content-length=0
> 19(2798) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:620]: parse_msg(): SIP Reply
> (status):
> 19(2798) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:622]: parse_msg(): version:
> <SIP/2.0>
> 19(2798) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:624]: parse_msg(): status:
> <200>
> 19(2798) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:626]: parse_msg(): reason:
> <OK>
> 19(2798) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/parse_via.c:1303]: parse_via_param():
> Found param type 232, <branch> =
> <z9hG4bK1525.80a9e442000000000000000000000000.0>; state=6
> 19(2798) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/parse_via.c:1303]: parse_via_param():
> Found param type 235, <rport> = <33940>; state=16
> 19(2798) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/parse_via.c:2639]: parse_via(): end of
> header reached, state=5
> 19(2798) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:498]: parse_headers(): Via
> found, flags=2
> 19(2798) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:500]: parse_headers(): this
> is the first via
> 19(2798) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/parse_addr_spec.c:185]: parse_to_param():
> add param: tag=1mB9HryQ8ZBFc
> 19(2798) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/parse_addr_spec.c:864]:
> parse_addr_spec(): end of header reached, state=29
> 19(2798) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:171]: get_hdr_field(): <To>
> [59]; uri=[sip:2.2.2.2:5060;transport=tcp]
> 19(2798) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:174]: get_hdr_field(): to
> body (39)[<sip:2.2.2.2:5060;transport=tcp>], to tag (13)[1mB9HryQ8ZBFc]
> 19(2798) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:152]: get_hdr_field(): cseq
> <CSeq>: <10> <OPTIONS>
> 19(2798) DEBUG: <core> [core/receive.c:319]: receive_msg(): --- received sip
> message - reply - call-id: [3aa18693487268dc-2790@1.1.1.1] - cseq: [10
> OPTIONS]
> 19(2798) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:185]: get_hdr_field():
> content_length=0
> 19(2798) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:89]: get_hdr_field(): found
> end of header
>
> Are these SIP messages expected to come from other ports than the listen port
> (5060 in this case)? Also, if the worker source port is not 5060, shouldn’t
> the SIP message get updated with the correct port?
>
> In the case of OPTIONS, Freeswitch is replying correctly to the source port:
> 33940.
>
> However, in the case of an in dialog BYE, Freeswitch is NOT replying to the
> source port of the Kamailio messages, but only to port 5060. Here is an
> example (relayed from web sockets to freeswitch over TCP) INVITE (as received
> from Freeswitch):
>
> recv 1481 bytes from tcp/[1.1.1.1]:33940 at 16:56:47.920698:
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> INVITE sip:991...@sip.domain.com SIP/2.0
> Record-Route: <sip:1.1.1.1;transport=tcp;r2=on;lr;nat=yes>
> Record-Route: <sip:1.1.1.1:5061;transport=tls;r2=on;lr;nat=yes>
> Via: SIP/2.0/TCP
> 1.1.1.1;branch=z9hG4bKd408.3f53e940ccb20c1033df4b3a8ebd8a34.0;i=1
> Via: SIP/2.0/TLS
> 172.22.199.110:55304;received=5.5.5.5;rport=39518;branch=z9hG4bKPj5Css6JomCt9Cli2cCINbXi4FbPM5wewG;alias
> Max-Forwards: 69
> From: "Noah Mehl"
> <sip:5135555555@inbound-jail>;tag=s3i3y2tiOCgnUId5TD4Vp0UChf9GyEy9
> To: <sip:991012@inbound-jail>
> Contact:
> <sip:74895612@172.22.199.110:54887;transport=tls;alias=5.5.5.5~39518~3>
> Call-ID: 5aoRBMBHahxqSLzrIpFnlfRz.UcGsmfq
> CSeq: 27271 INVITE
> Allow: SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, UPDATE, MESSAGE, REFER
> Supported: replaces, norefersub, gruu
> User-Agent: Blink Pro 4.6.0 (MacOSX)
> Content-Type: application/sdp
> Content-Length: 528
>
> v=0
> o=- 3812979407 3812979407 IN IP4 5.5.5.5
> s=Blink Pro 4.6.0 (MacOSX)
> t=0 0
> m=audio 50016 RTP/SAVP 113 0 101
> c=IN IP4 5.5.5.5
> a=rtcp:50017
> a=rtpmap:113 opus/48000/2
> a=fmtp:113 useinbandfec=1
> a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000
> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000
> a=fmtp:101 0-16
> a=crypto:1 AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_80
> inline:UhHq6hth9HqALmiJ3AEeoGkixObBzkLURG60wJKT
> a=crypto:2 AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_32
> inline:VKYaSCVwgvXCPaRvudTrgLORhWmOA7wyDJVeGjcu
> a=sendrecv
> a=oldmediaip:172.22.199.110
> a=oldmediaip:172.22.199.110
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> This doesn’t seem valid, as the top Via doesn’t have a port specified?
>
> For reference, just rebuilt form the 5.4 branch today:
>
> commit 62dff5b8b157236cae7defe64291a6e4a8ae27b5 (upstream/5.4)
> Author: Kamailio Dev <kamailio....@kamailio.org>
> Date: Wed Oct 28 20:16:28 2020 +0100
>
> modules: readme files regenerated - modules ... [skip ci]
>
> Thanks!
>
> ~Noah
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
