Just to add that loose_route() works OK if I add to config

alias=tenantX.teams.tutpro.com:8005

So that sort of proves that ;ns=ext_tls param in the first Route URI has
no effect.

-- Juha

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm returning to this thread, since after some more testing, I found that
> loose_route() does not (at least always) detect that a pair of route
> headers denotes itself.
> 
> In config I have defined:
> 
> listen=tls:192.x.x.x:8005  name "ext_tls"
> modparam("rr", "sockname_mode", 1)
> 
> and Route header looks like this:
> 
> ROUTE: 
> <sip:tenantX.teams.tutpro.com:8005;transport=tls;r2=on;sn=ext_tls;lr;n1;avp=savp;pm=0>,<sip:192.x.x.x:5070;transport=tcp;r2=on;lr;n1;avp=savp;pm=0>
> 
> Then this code:
> 
> loose_route();
> if ($du != "") {
>   xinfo("Routing in-dialog $rm <$ru> from <$fu> to <$du> based on route 
> uri\n");
> }
> 
> produces to syslog:
> 
> INFO: Routing in-dialog ACK <...> from <...> to <...> based on route uri
> 
> -- Juha
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Reply via email to