Hello, do you replicate items in the htable via dmq? Does the htable have autoexpire value set?
Cheers, Daniel On 30.06.21 13:54, George Diamantopoulos wrote: > Forwarding my reply to the list, using gmail's reply button set > Henning as the sole recipient :-\ > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > From: *George Diamantopoulos* <georged...@gmail.com > <mailto:georged...@gmail.com>> > Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2021 at 02:25 > Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Possible memory leak on 5.5.x (new)? > To: Henning Westerholt <h...@skalatan.de <mailto:h...@skalatan.de>> > > > Hello Henning, > > Thanks for your reply. Here's what has come up after a few hours: > > shm55: https://pastebin.com/h9JCePmc <https://pastebin.com/h9JCePmc> > shm54: https://pastebin.com/Nx5xEEnA <https://pastebin.com/Nx5xEEnA> > > It seems to me htable is the culprit? Are you seeing anything > different? 54 has been running for 77020 seconds, 55 for 28521 > (significantly less). > > I'm going to turn it off until we figure something out... > > BR, > George > > On Fri, 25 Jun 2021 at 18:17, Henning Westerholt <h...@skalatan.de > <mailto:h...@skalatan.de>> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Good observation. Please run the memory statistics CLI commands to > get more hints about the module that might cause it (as per below > link). Then please report more details. If you can point to a > particular module, you can also open an issue on our tracker. > > > > https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/tutorials/troubleshooting/memory > <https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/tutorials/troubleshooting/memory> > > > > Cheers, > > > > Henning > > > > *From:* sr-users <sr-users-boun...@lists.kamailio.org > <mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.kamailio.org>> *On Behalf Of > *George Diamantopoulos > *Sent:* Friday, June 25, 2021 4:53 PM > *To:* Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > <sr-users@lists.kamailio.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>> > *Subject:* [SR-Users] Possible memory leak on 5.5.x (new)? > > > > Hello all, > > > > I'm still investigating the (most likely non-kamailio-related) > memory leak of my previous message to the list, there have been no > developments so far. I'll update if anything changes. > > > > This concerns a new finding which seems to affect kamailio 5.5.x. > I have two kamailio instances receiving the same traffic via > round-robin. I upgraded only one of them to 5.5.1 and left the > other to 5.4.6 as I feared of any issues arising. I was lucky to > do so, because with identical configuration, 5.5.x seems to run > out of SHM very quickly. Here are links to graphs produced by our > monitoring system: > > > > Old kamailio (no memory leak): https://pasteboard.co/K8fVBiD.png > <https://pasteboard.co/K8fVBiD.png> > > New kamailio (possible leak): https://pasteboard.co/K8fVS9N.png > <https://pasteboard.co/K8fVS9N.png> > > > > The configuration uses mtree, htable, vars and vns extensively. > Has anyone come across anything similar? Let me know if I can > provide any further information to help disect this. Thanks! > > > > BR, > > George > > > __________________________________________________________ > Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions > * sr-users@lists.kamailio.org > Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the > sender! > Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe: > * https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
__________________________________________________________ Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions * sr-users@lists.kamailio.org Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender! Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe: * https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users