I noticed that when jsSIP UA that has registered over wss calls another SIP UA that has registered over tls, record_route() adds only one Route URI to outgoing INVITE (example below). This causes BYE to fail.
This issue may be caused by the fact that both UAs register over the same Kamailio tls listening socket. Still two Route URIs should be added in the same way as is done when one UA registers over tcp and the other over udp. -- Juha --------------------------------------------------------------------- 09:25:43.639833 wss:87.95.73.155:19458 wss:192.27.134.1:5061 INVITE sip:f...@test.tutpro.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/WSS jovobf9n4svm.invalid;branch=z9hG4bK2639638 Max-Forwards: 69 To: <sip:f...@test.tutpro.com> From: " Test" <sip:t...@test.tutpro.com>;tag=f7lpsuo7cb Call-ID: ovhd9fu1fl1a66nec011 CSeq: 1387 INVITE Contact: <sip:t...@test.tutpro.com;gr=urn:uuid:e7f92a54-2295-4772-abc8-504be07e94c5> ... 09:25:43.649462 tls:192.27.134.1:5061 tls:87.95.73.155:19461 INVITE sip:foo-0x793ee87a90@10.158.141.103:38378;transport=tls SIP/2.0 Record-Route: <sip:192.27.134.1:5061;transport=ws;sn=ext_tls;lr;n2;dtlsf=avp;pm=0;ice> Via: SIP/2.0/TLS 192.27.134.1:5061;branch=z9hG4bK637c.7e15ef5b84ea054cfc8ea3d4e860521f.0 Via: SIP/2.0/WSS jovobf9n4svm.invalid;rport=19458;received=87.95.73.155;branch=z9hG4bK2639638 Max-Forwards: 68 To: <sip:f...@test.tutpro.com> From: " Test" <sip:t...@test.tutpro.com>;tag=f7lpsuo7cb Call-ID: ovhd9fu1fl1a66nec011 CSeq: 1387 INVITE Contact: <sip:t...@test.tutpro.com;gr=urn:uuid:e7f92a54-2295-4772-abc8-504be07e94c5> __________________________________________________________ Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions * sr-users@lists.kamailio.org Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender! Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe: * https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
