That's a very complicated question. Much depends on the nature of the code you're running!
A general principle is that compiled languages are faster to execute than interpreted ones, but it is common to front-load the interpreting process nowadays, i.e. JIT compilation. It's probably fair to say that the JVM has a higher memory footprint than some more economical runtimes, but a lot of that cost is reclaimed in performance. This question touches on a rather expansive and broad theme in computer science and compiler innards. It's not easy to answer at all. > On Dec 17, 2022, at 8:29 AM, Дилян Палаузов <dpa-kamai...@bapha.be> wrote: > > Hello, > > KEMI can be programmed in Java, JavaScript, Lua(sr), Squirrel, Mono, Perl, > Python(2,3,3s), Ruby. > > Which language binding has the lowest runtime overhead in CPU-terms? How > about lowest overhead in terms of RAM? > > Kind regards > Дилян > __________________________________________________________ > Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions > To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-le...@lists.kamailio.org > Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the > sender! > Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe: -- Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/ __________________________________________________________ Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-le...@lists.kamailio.org Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender! Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:
