Thanks very much for the clarification Daniel! Appreciate it!
However it does seem that some modules have inconsistencies with return
values now. So, for instance, the is_ip_rfc918() says it will return true
or false (
https://kamailio.org/docs/modules/5.6.x/modules/ipops.html#ipops.f.is_ip_rfc1918
- most functions of this module return true or false) and then when used
directly with return, it terminates execution. Based on your explanation,
it shouldn't return true or false, but likely -1 or 1, which would never be
considered 'return 0'
Also, the below code works in version 5.4, but terminates execution in
version 5.6, so are you aware of changes in this behaviour in version 5.5
or 5.6 (before the 5.7 changes you mentioned)?
route[is_src_private]
{
return is_ip_rfc1918("$si");
}
request_route
{
...
if (route(is_src_private)) {
xlog("L_NOTICE", "SRC private\n");
} else {
xlog("L_NOTICE", "SRC public\n");
}
...
}
Best regards!
Patrick
On Fri, 28 Apr 2023 at 16:29, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <mico...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> false is 0 and it was actually designed for setting global parameters, not
> for use as comparison with functions return code or as parameter for return
> from route blocks. Like:
>
> log_stderror = false
>
> The grammar of the language defines a coupe of token variants for same
> purpose:
>
>
> YES "yes"|"true"|"on"|"enable"
> NO "no"|"false"|"off"|"disable"
>
> Where YES is replaced by 1 and NO is replaced by 0:
>
> <INITIAL>{YES} { count(); yylval.intval=1;
> yy_number_str=yytext; return NUMBER; }
> <INITIAL>{NO} { count(); yylval.intval=0;
> yy_number_str=yytext; return NUMBER; }
>
> In the devel version (upcoming 5.7.0), the evaluation of return mode can
> be controlled by core parameter return_mode, allowing to switch to a more
> "standard" mode, similar to other scripting languages -- see:
>
> - https://www.kamailio.org/wikidocs/cookbooks/devel/core/#return_mode
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
> On 28.04.23 08:14, Patrick Wakano wrote:
>
> Hi list,
> Hope you are all well!
>
> I'm using Kamailio version 5.6.4 (installed from the repo
> rpm.kamailio.org/centos/7) and noticed that every route that uses "return
> false" is exiting the script, instead of returning.... This was not the
> case on version 5.4.6 as the same script is running fine.....
> From this page
> https://www.kamailio.org/wikidocs/tutorials/faq/main/#how-is-the-function-return-code-evaluated,
> I would think that when a route returns false, it would return -1 and not
> stop execution, since negative is equal to false, but it is actually
> stopping (same as return 0)...
> So, as an example, this test code doesn't work as expected. In case the
> source is a public IP, the script doesn't print the "SRC public" it just
> exits and then of course every other logic meant to be done is not
> executed....
>
> route[is_src_private]
> {
> if (is_ip_rfc1918("$si")) {
> return true;
> }
> return false;
> #return is_ip_rfc1918("$si"); *# this doesn't work too in case
> the $si is a public IP*
> }
> request_route
> {
> ...
> if (route(is_src_private)) {
> xlog("L_NOTICE", "SRC private\n");
> } else {
> xlog("L_NOTICE", "SRC public\n");
> }
> ...
> }
> If is_src_private is changed to return -1 instead of false, then it all
> works fine.
>
> Also, I noticed that the following code will print "TEST: 0" in case the
> $si is public and then stop execution. So looks like false is really being
> converted to 0, but I guess that's unexpected... anyway apologies if I'm
> missing something obvious....
> route[is_src_private]
> {
> $var(t) = false;
> if (is_ip_rfc1918("$si")) {
> $var(t) = true;
> }
> xlog("L_ERR", "TEST: $var(t)\n");
> return $var(t);
> }
>
> I could not find a recent ticket or email related to this situation and
> I've already spent hours trying to understand what is the logic/problem
> here, so would anyone have been across a similar case that could provide
> some insight and clarify what is the expected behaviour of the *false*
> usage (and boolean in general if possible)?
>
> Thank you,
> Kind regards,
> Patrick Wakano
>
> __________________________________________________________
> Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions
> To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-le...@lists.kamailio.org
> Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the
> sender!
> Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:
>
>
> --
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.comwww.twitter.com/miconda --
> www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
> Kamailio World Conference - June 5-7, 2023 - www.kamailioworld.com
>
>
__________________________________________________________
Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions
To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-le...@lists.kamailio.org
Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the
sender!
Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:
