Just following up on this; Should an ACK absorbed by the SL module get counted
as a dropped request?
Kaufman
From: Kaufman <bkauf...@bcmone.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2023 6:52 PM
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List <sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
Subject: [SR-Users] SL absorbed ACK is counted as dropped by core.drop_requests
CAUTION: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click
links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content
is safe.
Just checking to see if this is the designed behavior. The SL module will
attempt to match ACKs for stateless replies and handle them (absorb them?).
The question I have is that it looks as though this ACK gets counted as dropped
by the core.drop_requests from the KEX module. Tested using this config:
#!KAMAILIO
loadmodule "pv"
loadmodule "sl"
loadmodule "xlog"
loadmodule "kex"
loadmodule "corex"
loadmodule "ctl"
modparam("sl", "bind_tm", 0)
route {
xinfo("[$ci] $rm Request. Src:[$si:$sp] RURI:[$ru] To:[$tu] From:[$fu]\n");
sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found");
}
event_route[sl:filtered-ack] {
xnotice("sl:filtered-ack ACK [$ci] to local reply absorbed\n");
}
Then validate by kamcmd stats.fetch core:drop_requests
Is this the designed and "correct" behavior?
Kaufman
__________________________________________________________
Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions
To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-le...@lists.kamailio.org
Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the
sender!
Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:
