Thank you, Daniel! I was just confused because I do use set_rtpengine_set() with rtpengine_manage() quite a lot, for some years now, and it works fine...
-- Alex > On 9 Nov 2023, at 03:24, Daniel-Constantin Mierla via sr-users > <sr-users@lists.kamailio.org> wrote: > > Hello, > not sure why that remark is there, because contradicts with the first > paragraph that has: > "Sets the ID of the RTP proxy set to be used for the next rtpengine_delete(), > rtpengine_offer(), rtpengine_answer() or rtpengine_manage() command." > - > https://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/rtpengine.html#rtpengine.f.set_rtpengine_set > I don't think that the last statement is good, maybe it propagated without > notice from a very old version. From code point of view, there is no reason > for set_rtpengine_set() not to work for rtpengine_manage(), this function is > a pretty simple wrapper for rtpengine_offer()/_answer()/_delete(). > I am going to remove that last statement from docs. > Cheers, > Daniel > On 09.11.23 01:06, David Cunningham via sr-users wrote: >> Hi Alex, >> >> It's on the page that you linked to: "This is supported by all rtpengine >> commands except rtpengine_manage()." >> >> Thanks. >> >> >> On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 at 12:55, Alex Balashov <abalas...@evaristesys.com> wrote: >> Hi David, >> >> Whence the impression that sets aren't compatible with rtpengine_manage()? >> >> https://kamailio.org/docs/modules/5.7.x/modules/rtpengine.html#rtpengine.f.set_rtpengine_set >> >> "Sets the ID of the RTP proxy set to be used for the next >> rtpengine_delete(), >> rtpengine_offer(), rtpengine_answer() or rtpengine_manage() command. The >> parameter >> can be an integer or a config variable holding an integer." >> >> Or are you using an earlier version of Kamailio in which this may not have >> been true? >> >> -- Alex >> >> > On 8 Nov 2023, at 18:52, David Cunningham <dcunning...@voisonics.com> >> > wrote: >> > >> > Hi Alex, >> > >> > Thank you for the reply. We use a large weight of 99999999 to send almost >> > all calls to the 22.x and 33.x servers without using sets. We avoided sets >> > because our Kamailio configuration uses rtpengine_manage(), which >> > according to the documentation is not compatible with set_rtpengine_set(). >> > I'll try it without the 11.x server and the large weights, and see if the >> > calls are evenly distributed between the 22.x and 33.x servers then. >> > >> > Thanks again. >> > >> > >> > On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 at 10:25, Alex Balashov via sr-users >> > <sr-users@lists.kamailio.org> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > From the docs: >> > >> > "The balancing inside a set is done automatically by the module based on >> > the weight of each RTPEngine from the set. The default weight is 1, if >> > another RTPEngine should be used twice as often as the first one, one >> > would specify the weight 2 for this server, for example." >> > >> > I am unsure as to what effect such large values as 99999999 might have on >> > this arithmetic. >> > >> > It seems to me that if what you really want to accomplish is to evenly >> > distribute calls between 22.22.22.22 and 33.33.33.33, with 11.11.11.11 >> > only as a last-resort backup, then you should put the first two into one >> > naive set without any weights, e.g. >> > >> > modparam("rtpengine_sock", "1 == udp:22.22.22.22:7724 >> > udp:33.33.33.33:7724") >> > >> > Then put 11.11.11.11 into a set of its own: >> > >> > modparam("rtpengine_sock", "2 == udp:11.11.11.11:22724") >> > >> > By default, set 1 should be invoked: >> > >> > set_rtpengine_set("1"); >> > rtpengine_{offer,manage}("..."); >> > >> > According to the docs, rtpengine_offer() will return a negative value if >> > there is a failure of both: >> > >> > "The function will return true on success and false (-1) on various >> > failures, like >> > using rtp_engine_offer() on a SIP MESSAGE request or communication >> > with rtpengine fails." >> > >> > Presumably, rtpengine_manage() does the same. Accordingly, you can do >> > something like: >> > >> > set_rtpengine_set("1"); >> > >> > if(!rtpengine_offer("...")) { >> > if($rc == -1) { >> > set_rtpengine_set("2"); >> > rtpengine_offer("..."); >> > } >> > } >> > >> > Exact details and your mileage may vary. >> > >> > -- Alex >> > >> > > On 8 Nov 2023, at 15:33, David Cunningham via sr-users >> > > <sr-users@lists.kamailio.org> wrote: >> > > >> > > Hello, >> > > >> > > We have a Kamailio configuration with the following, however all the >> > > load is going to the server at 22.22.22.22 (hiding the real IP >> > > obviously) instead of being shared evenly between 22.22.22.22 and >> > > 33.33.33.33. Can anyone please tell me why? The rtpengine server at >> > > 11.11.11.11 is intended to only receive calls if the other two are >> > > offline. Thank you very much. >> > > >> > > #!define RTPENGINE_ADDR "udp:11.11.11.11:7724=1 >> > > udp:22.22.22.22:7724=99999999 udp:33.33.33.33:7724=99999999" >> > > >> > > modparam( "rtpengine", "rtpengine_sock", RTPENGINE_ADDR ) >> > > >> > > -- >> > > David Cunningham, Voisonics Limited >> > > http://voisonics.com/ >> > > USA: +1 213 221 1092 >> > > New Zealand: +64 (0)28 2558 3782 >> > > __________________________________________________________ >> > > Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions >> > > To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-le...@lists.kamailio.org >> > > Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to >> > > the sender! >> > > Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe: >> > >> > -- >> > Alex Balashov >> > Principal Consultant >> > Evariste Systems LLC >> > Web: https://evaristesys.com >> > Tel: +1-706-510-6800 >> > >> > __________________________________________________________ >> > Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions >> > To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-le...@lists.kamailio.org >> > Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to >> > the sender! >> > Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe: >> > >> > >> > -- >> > David Cunningham, Voisonics Limited >> > http://voisonics.com/ >> > USA: +1 213 221 1092 >> > New Zealand: +64 (0)28 2558 3782 >> >> -- >> Alex Balashov >> Principal Consultant >> Evariste Systems LLC >> Web: https://evaristesys.com >> Tel: +1-706-510-6800 >> >> >> >> -- >> David Cunningham, Voisonics Limited >> http://voisonics.com/ >> USA: +1 213 221 1092 >> New Zealand: +64 (0)28 2558 3782 >> >> __________________________________________________________ >> Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions >> To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-le...@lists.kamailio.org >> Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the >> sender! >> Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe: >> > -- > Daniel-Constantin Mierla (@ asipto.com) > twitter.com/miconda -- linkedin.com/in/miconda > Kamailio Consultancy and Development Services > Kamailio Advanced Training - Online - Nov 14-16, 2023 -- asipto.com > __________________________________________________________ > Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions > To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-le...@lists.kamailio.org > Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the > sender! > Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe: -- Alex Balashov Principal Consultant Evariste Systems LLC Web: https://evaristesys.com Tel: +1-706-510-6800 __________________________________________________________ Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-le...@lists.kamailio.org Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender! Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:
