El Wed, 20 Oct 2010 13:11:22 +0200 Iñaki Baz Castillo <i...@aliax.net> escribió:
> 2010/10/20 Victor Pascual Avila <victor.pascual.av...@gmail.com>: > > I find this a worthwhile topic to pursue. I had been wondering whether > > this activity would turn out to be more of a profiling exercise, and > > whether the IETF might not be the best choice of venue for such work. > > From the current draft charter it looks like there will be at least > > some protocol extension work, for which I believe the IETF is the > > correct venue. On the other hand, the Unified Communications > > Interoperability Forum (UCIF) is seeking to advance the state of play > > on XMPP interoperability, and if we were just talking about a profile > > or BCP, that might have been a better venue. Perhaps the IETF should > > focus on requirements and protocol extensions, and consider whether > > the BCP work would be better done elsewhere. Or at least, there should > > be some coordination with other activities relating to XMPP > > interoperability. > > "Integrating" XMPP into SIP is a workaround IMHO, but the fact that > some work is being done in this area confirms the failure of SIMPLE. > IMHO it's better to define a new specification for presence in SIP > *from scratch* forgetting all about SIMPLE (all means all). > > Anyways, integrating such new specification with xmpp with extensions, gws or whatever method is a win-win strategy. _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
