Hi, that was _really_ fast. Thanks. :-)
One more question: Could I somehow test with the route[NAT] for example, if the request was from the main route { ... } or from the onreply_route[] ? Best regards, Bernhard ----- Original Message ----- From: Alex Balashov [mailto:abalas...@evaristesys.com] To: Bernhard Suttner [mailto:bernhard.sutt...@winet.ch] Cc: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org [mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org] Sent: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 21:37:34 +0100 Subject: Re: [SR-Users] onreply_route and failure_route > Yes. > > -- > Alex Balashov - Principal > Evariste Systems LLC > 260 Peachtree Street NW > Suite 2200 > Atlanta, GA 30303 > Tel: +1-678-954-0670 > Fax: +1-404-961-1892 > Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/ > > On Jan 29, 2011, at 3:35 PM, "Bernhard Suttner" <bernhard.sutt...@winet.ch > > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > is it possible to call a route within onreply_ and failure_route? I > > mean, within the main route { ... } its possible to call the route > > [NAT]. Is this also possible for this "special" routes? If this is > > possible, is it also allowed to call a route which will normally > > called from the main route { ... } > > > > Thanks in advance. > > > > Best regards, > > Bernhard > > > > _______________________________________________ > > SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing > > list > > sr-users@lists.sip-router.org > > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users