2011/5/25 Carl Wagner <carl.wag...@verbalworld.com>: > I am sorry, you are right. I was looking at rfc3665 Page 71, F10 and it > did not have a To: tag in the 200 OK to the cancel. > (I know that rfc3665 is just examples, and when in doubt I should use > rfc3261) > > The last paragraph of rfc3261, section 9.2 says to use section 8.2.6 to > construct the 200 (OK). > > > Not sure why Asterisk is not liking the 200 Canceling. > Does anyone see anything wrong with the Cancel or the 200 Canceling in the > log below?
Because Asterisk is buggy and expects (wrongly) that the Totag of the CANCEL must match the Totag of a previously received 1XX response. This is of course a wrong assumption as there could be diferent 1XX responses with different Totag (when forking). I remember that it just occurs if you set Asterisk sip.conf with pendantic-mode enabled. Asterisk is buggy. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <i...@aliax.net> _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users