Hello,
Please find the diff. t_reply_A.c is the orginal and t_reply_B.c is the
modified file.
--- t_reply_A.c 2011-10-14 10:05:45.093352500 -0400
+++ t_reply_B.c 2011-10-16 01:10:53.179916800 -0400
@@ -1726,6 +1726,8 @@
reply route */
SND_FLAGS_OR(&uas_rb->dst.send_flags,
&uas_rb->dst.send_flags,
&relayed_msg->rpl_send_flags);
+ /* Make the response to use the same IP
where it receives the message */
+ uas_rb->dst.send_flags.f |=
SND_F_FORCE_SOCKET;
}
}
update_reply_stats( relayed_code );
Thanks
JIjo
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <mico...@gmail.com
> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> can you send the patch with 'git diff' or 'diff -u' -- it will be easier to
> apply and analyze it. Once I get it, I will look over the case you reported
> in more details.
>
> Thanks,
> Daniel
>
>
> On 10/13/11 10:23 PM, Jijo wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel..
>
> I'm using version 3.1.0. I looked at the change but its done only for
> forward_reply.. How about relay_reply()?
>
> Thanks
> Jijo
>
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <
> mico...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I haven't understood exactly what you tried? Was it use of
>> force_send_socket(...) in onreply_route and didn't work? If yes, what
>> version are you runing, there was a fix for such case some time ago:
>>
>>
>> http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=9dbf735878acc87bab1a0740476f1d106f89412f
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel
>>
>>
>> On 10/13/11 1:00 AM, Jijo wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Our system has two IP address, one is used for kamailio and 2nd one is
>> used for data.
>> The problem is suppose a request came in to kamailio on a TCP connection
>> with first IP address and connection is torned down before sending the
>> response. Later when the response is send out kamialio is using the 2nd IP
>> to create the connection. The reason is kamailio doesn't have force socket
>> in in reply, so it uses INADDR_ANY for soruce addres .so kernel uses source
>> address based on the detaintion IP.
>>
>> I tired to force the socket using pseudo variable $fs or
>> force_send_socket(), but neither of them worked from reply_route.
>>
>> So i modfied the code relay_replay to set the SND_F_FORCE_SOCKET which
>> will use the address where request is recieved as source address to make
>> the TCP connection The code change is shown below.
>>
>> Please let me know is there anyother way we could acheive it?
>>
>>
>> }else{
>> buf = build_res_buf_from_sip_res( relayed_msg, &res_len );
>> /* if we build a message from shmem, we need to remove
>> via delete lumps which are now stirred in the shmem-ed
>> structure
>> */
>> if (branch!=relay) {
>> free_via_clen_lump(&relayed_msg->add_rm);
>> }
>> /* update send_flags with possible additions from the
>> reply route */
>> SND_FLAGS_OR(&uas_rb->dst.send_flags, &uas_rb->dst.send_flags,
>> &relayed_msg->rpl_send_flags);
>> /* Make the response to use the same IP where it receives
>> the message */
>> * *
>> * uas_rb->dst.send_flags.f |= SND_F_FORCE_SOCKET; *
>> }
>>
>> Thanks
>> JIjo
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
>> listsr-us...@lists.sip-router.orghttp://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>
>>
>> --
>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- http://www.asipto.com
>> Kamailio Advanced Training, Dec 5-8, Berlin:
>> http://asipto.com/u/kathttp://linkedin.com/in/miconda --
>> http://twitter.com/miconda
>>
>>
>
> --
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- http://www.asipto.com
> Kamailio Advanced Training, Dec 5-8, Berlin:
> http://asipto.com/u/kathttp://linkedin.com/in/miconda --
> http://twitter.com/miconda
>
>
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
