Alex wrote:

The Kamailio 'rtpproxy' module goes out to the rtpproxy service[1] and asks it 
to engage the call, saying: "Can you please allocate and provide me with a pair 
of ports for each end of this call?"  The rtpproxy process answers, and 
Kamailio then writes the IP and ports provided by rtpproxy into the SDP of both 
the requests and replies involved in setting up the call.



What if both endpoints are on different networks?



Endpoint 1 -------------- Kamailio -------------- Endpoint 2

         |                                      |                               
    |

         |                                      |                               
    |

         |                                      |                               
    |

         +-------------------- RTPProxy -----------------+



Please correct me if I'm wrong:

1)      Endpoint 1 (10.0.0.1) sends an INVITE containing the offer to Kamailio 
(10.0.0.2).

2)      Kamailio asks RTPProxy to engage the call and allocate two ports.

3)      Kamailio writes the IP and port of the RTPProxy (10.0.0.3:1000) in the 
SDP of the 100 Trying and replies back to Endpoint 1.

4)      Kamailio (20.0.0.2) now sends the INVITE with offer to Endpoint 2 
(20.0.0.1), but with modified SDP (20.0.0.3:1001).

5)      .....

6)      Endpoint 1 sends its media to 10.0.0.3:1000 and Endpoint 2 sends its 
media to 20.0.0.3:1001.

7)      RTPProxy bridges both ends.



What makes it so difficult for me to understand is that both Kamailio and 
RTPProxy are connected to two different networks. A call between endpoint 1 and 
2 must be bridged by Kamailio and RTPProxy.

How does Kamailio know it has to tell RTPProxy to engage a call on network 
10.0.0.0 and 20.0.0.0 and allocate two ports, 1 for each network?



Regards,



Grant



-----Original Message-----
From: 
sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org<mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org>
 [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of Alex Balashov
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 5:11 PM
To: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Need help understanding/separating signaling from media



Hi Grant,



On 01/28/2013 11:03 AM, Grant Bagdasarian wrote:



> I think that the RTP Proxy module does precisely this, but what I

> still don't understand is how the rtp stream is passed between these

> two agents for each call.



The Kamailio 'rtpproxy' module goes out to the rtpproxy service[1] and asks it 
to engage the call, saying: "Can you please allocate and provide me with a pair 
of ports for each end of this call?"  The rtpproxy process answers, and 
Kamailio then writes the IP and ports provided by rtpproxy into the SDP of both 
the requests and replies involved in setting up the call.



The result is that as far as both UAs are concerned, rtpproxy is their 
endpoint, and they will send media to it.  Kamailio instructs rtpproxy to 
bridge both streams.



When the call is torn down, Kamailio tells rtpproxy to disengage and deallocate 
the bridge mapping for those streams.



-- Alex



[1] Which may be running on the same host, or may be running on another host, 
in a distributed fashion.  Kamailio talks to rtpproxy through rtpproxy's UDP 
control socket, and more than one rtpproxy may be used, both for failover and 
round-robin load distribution.  This is readily baked into the rtpproxy module.



--

Alex Balashov - Principal

Evariste Systems LLC

235 E Ponce de Leon Ave

Suite 106

Decatur, GA 30030

United States

Tel: +1-678-954-0670

Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.alexbalashov.com/



_______________________________________________

SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list

sr-users@lists.sip-router.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>

http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Reply via email to