On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 5:50 AM, Richard Fuchs <rfu...@sipwise.com> wrote: > On 04/02/13 17:39, aft wrote: > >> So the bottom line is i have to include the code in both places. >> >> Another thing is i'm assuming you know much about the development of this >> media >> relay. So i'm asking, is there any plan for including "repacketization" >> feature? >> >> Its very crucial for our operation, so if there is no plan for it, >> then i wish to do it >> myself. Although i know nothing of its codebase, but if active developers >> help, >> i think i can do it. > > Yes and no. Repacketization isn't a priority for us, but we do have > definitive plans on supporting other modifications to the RTP packets in > the near future, most notably bridging between different RTP profiles > (such as RTP to SRTP). Repacketization would fit in there well. However, > I can't give a time line for this, and I also can't tell yet if we want > to support these operations in kernel mode at all. The CPU time required > might make the additional CPU overhead of passing packets back and forth > between user space and kernel space negligible. Or it might not, it's > hard to tell at this point.
Thanks for the reply. I've started reading the code to understand what it does. We had a software which was "all kernel" to do these modification. Although That software is not a media relay, rather than it sits right on top of a existing media relay to do modifications. That software, also implemented as kernel module(not GPLed at this moment), performed well. > > cheers > > _______________________________________________ > SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list > sr-users@lists.sip-router.org > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- -aft _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users