Richard Fuchs writes: > Would you and everyone else agree that unconditionally encoding the > param in base64 would be the preferred solution? I have some pending > additions to the path module and could include that as well.
i don't agree. characters that are not param-unreserved or unreserved should be escaped as rfc3261 tells: pvalue = 1*paramchar paramchar = param-unreserved / unreserved / escaped base64 encoding would make the value totally unreadable. -- juha _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users