Richard Fuchs writes:

> Would you and everyone else agree that unconditionally encoding the
> param in base64 would be the preferred solution? I have some pending
> additions to the path module and could include that as well.

i don't agree.  characters that are not param-unreserved or unreserved
should be escaped as rfc3261 tells:

pvalue = 1*paramchar
paramchar = param-unreserved / unreserved / escaped

base64 encoding would make the value totally unreadable.

-- juha

_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Reply via email to