On Wednesday 21 January 2015 23:52:46 Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > It is an ACK for a negative response, therefore it is hop-by-hop > (received and discared by kamailio, then a new one is generated to the > next hop). The information of direction which was detected with Route > header ftag cannot be done in this case. I will try to figure out how > can be solved...
Am I to naive to think that these ACKs to negatives always (callid masking and whether topoh is active or not) need to use the Call-ID from the negative (in this case 488) response? Call-ID has only to be rewritten in forwarding the negative response towards the endpoint that triggered it (which is done correctly in my call trace) -- Telefoon: 088 0100 700 Sales: sa...@pocos.nl | Service: serviced...@pocos.nl http://www.pocos.nl/ | Croy 9c, 5653 LC Eindhoven | Kamer van Koophandel 17097024 _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
