Hello Just modify RURI, t_relay(), and a new branch will automatically be created
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 8:58 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <mico...@gmail.com > wrote: > Are you calling t_relay() from branch_route? > > Maybe you should load debugger module and enable cfgtrace to see what > actions from kamailio.cfg are executed. > > Just changing the $ru and relaying should work when used in request_route. > > Cheers, > Daniel > > > On 16/03/15 14:14, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote: > > I mean that algorithm of creating new headers of creating INVOTE message > is the same for branch_branch route and single client. Only one difference > i that I use $ru="sip:"+$tU+"@"+$(du{s.select,1,:} vs append_branch(" > sip:$tU@$(du{s.select,1,:})") > > This is full algo of my reqest > the first is I check at location table num of endpoints for this peer and > then at the "while" do this > > sql_pvquery("ca", "select > received from location where > contact='$dbr(ra=>[$var(i),0])'","$var(recieved)"); > $du=$var(recieved); > xlog("L_INFO","SQL query return recieved {$var(recieved)} for {$tU}. > Destination is {$du}\n"); > # if only one client used it means that I use $ru > if ($dbr(ra=>rows)==1) > { > xlog("L_INFO","Single ANGENT"); > xlog("L_INFO","WS Branch is {$du)} for {$tU}\n"); > rtpengine_manage("force trust-address replace-origin > replace-session-connection ICE=force RTP/SAVPF"); > t_on_reply("REPLY_FROM_WS"); > $ru="sip:"+$tU+"@"+$(du{s.select,1,:}); > route("FINAL_RELAY"); > } > else > { > append_branch("sip:$tU@$(du{s.select,1,:})","0.7"); > } > > #after while ended if more that one endpoint used > > t_on_branch("1"); > return; > > branch_route[1]{ > > if($du=~"transport=ws"){ > xlog("L_INFO","Websocket Branch is {$du} for {$tU}\n"); > rtpengine_manage("force trust-address replace-origin > replace-session-connection ICE=force RTP/SAVPF"); > t_on_reply("REPLY_FROM_WS"); > } > else{ > xlog("L_INFO","UDP Branch is {$du)} for {$tU}\n"); > rtpengine_manage("replace-origin replace-session-connection ICE=remove > RTP/AVP"); > t_on_reply("MANAGE_CLASSIC_REPLY"); > } > } > > route[FINAL_RELAY] > { > > if (!t_relay()) { > sl_reply_error(); > } > return; > } > > > > 2015-03-16 15:46 GMT+03:00 Yuriy Gorlichenko <ovoshl...@gmail.com>: > >> request_route >> >> 2015-03-16 15:43 GMT+03:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <mico...@gmail.com>: >> >>> Is this used in request_route or in failure_route or other routing >>> block? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Daniel >>> >>> >>> On 16/03/15 12:44, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote: >>> >>> If I use >>> >>> $ru="sip:"+$tU+"@"+$(du{s.select,1,:}); >>> >>> if (!t_relay()) { >>> sl_reply_error(); >>> } >>> >>> I see >>> >>> t_forward_nonack(): ERROR: t_forward_nonack: no branches for forwarding >>> Mar 16 11:36:04 Kamailio kamailio[4335]: ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:363]: >>> sl_reply_error(): ERROR: sl_reply_error used: I'm terribly sorry, server >>> error occurred (6/SL) >>> >>> if I use append_branch() >>> for single client - thats is ok but 2 invites going to client. >>> So client may pickup call and it successfully established. >>> >>> 2015-03-16 13:24 GMT+03:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <mico...@gmail.com>: >>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> instead of seturi use: >>>> >>>> $ru = "sip:" + $tU + "@" + $(du{s.select,1,:}); >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Daniel >>>> >>>> >>>> On 16/03/15 05:44, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote: >>>> >>>> Now. when I use >>>> >>>> seturi("sip:$tU@$(du{s.select,1,:})"); >>>> >>>> I see error at my log >>>> >>>> ERROR: tm [t_lookup.c:1264]: new_t(): ERROR: new_t: uri invalid >>>> ERROR: tm [t_lookup.c:1411]: t_newtran(): ERROR: t_newtran: new_t >>>> failed >>>> ERROR: tm [t_lookup.c:1264]: new_t(): ERROR: new_t: uri invalid >>>> ERROR: tm [t_lookup.c:1411]: t_newtran(): ERROR: t_newtran: new_t >>>> failed >>>> ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:363]: sl_reply_error(): ERROR: sl_reply_error >>>> used: Regretfully, we were not able to process the URI (479/SL) >>>> ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:363]: sl_reply_error(): ERROR: sl_reply_error >>>> used: Regretfully, we were not able to process the URI (479/SL) >>>> >>>> As i see error generate twice maby because I ure t_on branch() route >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 2015-03-16 7:18 GMT+03:00 Yuriy Gorlichenko <ovoshl...@gmail.com>: >>>> >>>>> Hello. I try to call multi[ple endpoints from my server using >>>>> append_branch. It works fine but when I have only one endpoint - kamailio >>>>> generate 2 INVITE requests to it. >>>>> As I understand it is original request and the next one is branch. >>>>> I used seturi() before for sending original reqest to destination, but >>>>> I can not see this function at kamailio 4.3. >>>>> Kamailio 4.3 uses send() dunnction? but it works at stateless mode. I >>>>> need analog of it or seturi that works at statefull mode. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing >>>> listsr-us...@lists.sip-router.orghttp://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierlahttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda - >>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda >>>> Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 >>>> Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >>>> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org >>>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing >>> listsr-us...@lists.sip-router.orghttp://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Daniel-Constantin Mierlahttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda - >>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda >>> Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 >>> Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >>> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org >>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >>> >>> >> > > -- > Daniel-Constantin Mierlahttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda - > http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda > Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 > Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com > > > _______________________________________________ > SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list > sr-users@lists.sip-router.org > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > >
_______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users