Hello,

When we can change our DNS IP then it works with following :

 

U 2015/03/20 10:06:06.504009 23.253.110.48:5060 -> 202.157.76.21:64051

ACK
sip:tester2@192.168.0.100:5060;transport=udp;registering_acc=23_253_110_48
SIP/2.0.

Call-ID: 143610160aa023568302b9c999b79f45@0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0.

CSeq: 2 ACK.

Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
23.253.110.48;branch=z9hG4bK7.601b877c92120368c17b3c0da0802af6.0.

Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
192.168.0.217:5060;rport=63789;received=202.157.76.21;branch=z9hG4bK-353035-
5aa153400d9ce60dfc573738a4b55232.

From: "tester1" <sip:tester1@23.253.110.48>;tag=3fdb1d0f.

To: "tester2" <sip:tester2@23.253.110.48>;tag=31532119.

Max-Forwards: 69.

Contact: "tester1"
<sip:tester1@192.168.0.217:5060;transport=udp;registering_acc=23_253_110_48;
alias=202.157.76.21~63789~1>.

User-Agent: Jitsi2.6.5390Windows 7.

Content-Length: 0.

 

But when we used another DNS IP (internet) and call then it  showing only
initialize..

If it has firewall issue then it will not work at all DNS IPs. 

 

I have attached before my config file for kamalio. 

 

Can you tell me what can be issue that it works at some DNS IP and not at
all?

 

Thanks 

 

 

 

From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mailto:mico...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 2:14 AM
To: Yogendra Gupta; 'Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List'
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Kamalio call issue

 

These are replies to INVITE requests, but if you see them, the INVITE passed
through the server as well.

If you are not aware of a firewall, then perhaps you don't have one unless
is a default installation with it enabled or one on the network.

I suggest you do sip tracing on the client machine to see if the invite
requests leave to the proper IP.

Ultimately can be also a problem caused by a NAT router with ALG, if the
client is behind such device.

Cheers,
Daniel

On 19/03/15 13:50, Yogendra Gupta wrote:

Hello,

 

When I am calling with other SIP user then I did not see any INVITE . that
have issue with DNS.

 

If we call with different DNS that is working fine then we see INVITE option
like

 

U 2015/03/19 12:39:01.744616 117.215.244.16:63380 -> 23.253.110.48:5060

SIP/2.0 180 Ringing.

CSeq: 2 INVITE.

Call-ID: d83c4bc1e75e54df5ebd06b74f9089ef@0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0.

From: "tester1"  <sip:tester1@23.253.110.48>
<sip:tester1@23.253.110.48>;tag=ef809ce0.

To:  <sip:tester2@23.253.110.48> <sip:tester2@23.253.110.48>;tag=23a5eaea.

Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
23.253.110.48;branch=z9hG4bKa1a3.21d8ef51bac2678fc26eca5975ae7b00.0,SIP/2.0/
UDP
192.168.0.217:5060;rport=62554;received=115.252.208.170;branch=z9hG4bK-34393
8-6f1017bcd9e693a4959717c9eabdc26e.

Record-Route:  <sip:23.253.110.48;lr=on;nat=yes>
<sip:23.253.110.48;lr=on;nat=yes>.

Contact: "tester2"
<sip:tester2@192.168.0.100:5060;transport=udp;registering_acc=23_253_110_48>
<sip:tester2@192.168.0.100:5060;transport=udp;registering_acc=23_253_110_48>
.

User-Agent: Jitsi2.6.5390Windows 7.

Content-Length: 0.

.

 

 

U 2015/03/19 12:39:01.744870 23.253.110.48:5060 -> 115.252.208.170:62554

SIP/2.0 180 Ringing.

CSeq: 2 INVITE.

Call-ID: d83c4bc1e75e54df5ebd06b74f9089ef@0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0.

From: "tester1"  <sip:tester1@23.253.110.48>
<sip:tester1@23.253.110.48>;tag=ef809ce0.

To:  <sip:tester2@23.253.110.48> <sip:tester2@23.253.110.48>;tag=23a5eaea.

Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
192.168.0.217:5060;rport=62554;received=115.252.208.170;branch=z9hG4bK-34393
8-6f1017bcd9e693a4959717c9eabdc26e.

Record-Route:  <sip:23.253.110.48;lr=on;nat=yes>
<sip:23.253.110.48;lr=on;nat=yes>.

Contact: "tester2"
<sip:tester2@192.168.0.100:5060;transport=udp;registering_acc=23_253_110_48;
alias=117.215.244.16~63380~1>
<sip:tester2@192.168.0.100:5060;transport=udp;registering_acc=23_253_110_48;
alias=117.215.244.16~63380~1>.

User-Agent: Jitsi2.6.5390Windows 7.

Content-Length: 0.

 

Can you tell me what can be issue of firewall dropping?

 

When I checked at server firewall:

 

sudo ufw status

Status: inactive

 

Let me know what can be other issue for it..

 

Thanks

 

From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mailto:mico...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2015 5:50 PM
To: Yogendra Gupta; 'Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List'
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Kamalio call issue

 

Hello,

OPTIONS is not the request for initiating the calls, that is INVITE. You
would need to know SIP a bit in order to be able to understand and configure
Kamailio.

If you don't see any INVITE on kamailo server via ngrep when you call, then
the issue is on client side or there is a firewall dropping it.

Cheers,
Daniel

On 19/03/15 11:39, Yogendra Gupta wrote:

Hello,

Thanks for nice support.

When we call to test2 user and run this command at server

ngrep -d any -qt -W byline "sip" port 5060

 

then we found following response at server:






-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda <http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda>  -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015
Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com





-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015
Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Reply via email to