Hello Daniel,
Look like transactions are not match when it send reply for NOTIFY. I think it
should reuse connection.
Here SDP output where cseq are match and asterisk does retransmissions until
time out.
Also I wonder where Path route is reused I see %* instead ; as delimiter
between transport and port.
Retransmitting #8 (NAT) to 10.18.130.46:5060:
NOTIFY sip:191@192.168.88.246:5062;transport=tcp SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.18.130.51:5060;branch=z9hG4bK6939f20d;rport
Max-Forwards: 70
Route:
<sip:inbound@10.18.130.46;lr;received=sip:client_public_ip:5062%3Btransport%3Dtcp>
From: "canlpbx02" <sip:canlpbx02@10.18.130.51>;tag=as4b212049
To: <sip:191@192.168.88.246:5062;transport=tcp>
Contact: <sip:canlpbx02@10.18.130.51:5060>
Call-ID: 14c7c8cc7335adf60f2be634132d3b2f@10.18.130.51:5060
CSeq: 102 NOTIFY
User-Agent: FPBX-12.0.43(12.8.1)
Event: message-summary
Content-Type: application/simple-message-summary
Content-Length: 89
Messages-Waiting: yes
Message-Account: sip:*97@10.18.130.51
Voice-Message: 24/0 (0/0)
---
Retransmitting #9 (NAT) to 10.18.130.46:5060:
NOTIFY sip:191@192.168.88.246:5062;transport=tcp SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.18.130.51:5060;branch=z9hG4bK6939f20d;rport
Max-Forwards: 70
Route:
<sip:inbound@10.18.130.46;lr;received=sip:99.251.238.38:5062%3Btransport%3Dtcp>
right here
From: "canlpbx02" <sip:canlpbx02@10.18.130.51>;tag=as4b212049
To: <sip:191@192.168.88.246:5062;transport=tcp>
Contact: <sip:canlpbx02@10.18.130.51:5060>
Call-ID: 14c7c8cc7335adf60f2be634132d3b2f@10.18.130.51:5060
CSeq: 102 NOTIFY
User-Agent: FPBX-12.0.43(12.8.1)
Event: message-summary
Content-Type: application/simple-message-summary
Content-Length: 89
Messages-Waiting: yes
Message-Account: sip:*97@10.18.130.51
Voice-Message: 24/0 (0/0)
---
<--- SIP read from UDP:10.18.130.46:5060 --->
SIP/2.0 408 Request Timeout
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
10.18.130.51:5060;branch=z9hG4bK6939f20d;rport=5060;received=10.18.130.51
From: "canlpbx02" <sip:canlpbx02@10.18.130.51>;tag=as4b212049
To:
<sip:191@192.168.88.246:5062;transport=tcp>;tag=dc299d9ac16f3377ac0b8dfa22eaf0a6-2fe2
Call-ID: 14c7c8cc7335adf60f2be634132d3b2f@10.18.130.51:5060
CSeq: 102 NOTIFY
Server: kamailio (4.2.3 (x86_64/linux))
Content-Length: 0
<------------->
Mar 23 08:45:47 canlvprx01 /usr/sbin/kamailio[20143]: ERROR: <core>
[tcp_main.c:4338]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): connect client_pub_ip:5063 failed
(timeout)
Slava.
From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <mico...@gmail.com>
To: "Slava Bendersky" <volga...@networklab.ca>
Cc: "sr-users" <sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 4:21:47 AM
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY
Hello,
as you can see the 408 is for another request, because the cseq is 103. The
first one has cseq 102, but has no Record-Route header, which is mandated by
new RFCs.
In kamailio, if you added in request_route when handling the NOTIFY, you can
try to add record route via reply_route if the client is not keeping it in
reply, kind of following fix:
reply_route {
if(is_method("NOTIFY")) {
if(!is_present_hf("Record-Route")) {
insert_hf("Record-Route: < sip:yourserverip:port;transport=...\r\n ");
}
}
Cheers,
Daniel
On 22/03/15 18:11, Slava Bendersky wrote:
Hello Daniel,
I still can't understand clearly why when asterisk send NOTIFY to client
through kamailio it coming back with with 408. I
I tried different case event change Contact:, but no luck can't I see what the
issue all routes in first SUBSCRIBE looks ok .
Any though or help will be really appreciate.
This what I see on asterisk debug
Reliably Transmitting (NAT) to 10.18.130.46:5060:
NOTIFY sip:102@192.168.88.243:5068;alias=client_pub_ip~5068~2 SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.18.130.51:5060;branch=z9hG4bK5dd3f266
Max-Forwards: 70
Route: <sip:10.18.130.46:5060;lr=on;ftag=3b27a2a409;nat=yes> --->Kamailio route
From: "canlpbx02" <sip:canlpbx02@10.18.130.51> ;tag=as56402f92
To: <sip:102@192.168.88.243:5068;alias=client_pub_ip~5068~2> ;tag=3b27a2a409
Contact: <sip:canlpbx02@10.18.130.51:5060>
Call-ID: b1edde040d695988
CSeq: 102 NOTIFY
User-Agent: FPBX-12.0.43(12.8.1)
Event: message-summary
Content-Type: application/simple-message-summary
Subscription-State: active
Content-Length: 88
Messages-Waiting: yes
Message-Account: sip:*97@10.18.130.51
Voice-Message: 5/0 (0/0)
---
<--- SIP read from UDP:10.18.130.46:5060 --->
SIP/2.0 200 OK
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.18.130.51:5060;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bK5dd3f266
From: "canlpbx02" <sip:canlpbx02@10.18.130.51> ;tag=as56402f92
To: <sip:102@192.168.88.243:5068;alias=client_pub_ip~5068~2> ;tag=3b27a2a409
Call-ID: b1edde040d695988
CSeq: 102 NOTIFY
Allow: ACK, BYE, CANCEL, INVITE, MESSAGE, NOTIFY, OPTIONS, REFER, SUBSCRIBE,
UPDATE
Server: Media5-fone/4.1.6.3283 Android/5.1
Supported: eventlist, replaces, timer
Content-Length: 0
<------------->
--- (10 headers 0 lines) ---
<--- SIP read from UDP:10.18.130.46:5060 --->
SIP/2.0 408 Request Timeout
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.18.130.51:5060;branch=z9hG4bK6386387f;rport=5060
From: "canlpbx02" <sip:canlpbx02@10.18.130.51> ;tag=as00936a6d
To: <sip:102@192.168.88.243:5066;alias=client_pub_ip~5066~2> ;tag=a3aea18741
Call-ID: 5a66b87a618d1042
CSeq: 103 NOTIFY
Server: kamailio (4.2.3 (x86_64/linux))
Content-Length: 0
<------------->
Slava.
From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <mico...@gmail.com>
To: "Slava Bendersky" <volga...@networklab.ca> , "sr-users"
<sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
Sent: Friday, March 13, 2015 1:28:33 PM
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY
Hello,
that function might be in textopsx module.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 13/03/15 14:25, Slava Bendersky wrote:
BQ_BEGIN
Hello Daniel,
Where possible find updated version of options for textops.
[sr_module.c:701]: find_mod_export_record(): find_export_record:
<remove_hf_value> not found
Specially Record-Route manipulation.
Slava.
From: "Slava Bendersky" <volga...@networklab.ca>
To: mico...@gmail.com
Cc: "sr-users" <sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
Sent: Friday, March 13, 2015 8:54:26 AM
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY
Hello Daniel,
Here paste for first SUBSCRIBE.
http://fpaste.org/197545/25118514/
Slava.
From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <mico...@gmail.com>
To: "Slava Bendersky" <volga...@networklab.ca>
Cc: "sr-users" <sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 5:09:17 AM
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY
Hello,
can you get the sip traffic from the network (from the first subscribe of this
presence dialog)? It will help to see the Route set.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 12/03/15 00:36, Slava Bendersky wrote:
BQ_BEGIN
Hello Daniel,
Here debug of the notify which failing. Look like transaction miss match
http://fpaste.org/196896/61168591/
Slava.
From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <mico...@gmail.com>
To: "Slava Bendersky" <volga...@networklab.ca> , "sr-users"
<sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 5:44:05 PM
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY
Hello,
it doesn't matter if there is a mix of transports. If the UA is mirroring the
Record-Route headers in the response to the NOTIFY, it should work fine.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 11/03/15 21:40, Slava Bendersky wrote:
BQ_BEGIN
Hello Daniel,
Is this matter that UDP and TCP transport in mix ?
Slava.
From: "Slava Bendersky" <volga...@networklab.ca>
To: mico...@gmail.com
Cc: "sr-users" <sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 4:21:39 PM
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY
Hello Daniel,
I have record route in WITHINDLG for NOTIFY, but it not helped behaviour is the
same it loosing route for NOTIFY.
Slava.
From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <mico...@gmail.com>
To: "Slava Bendersky" <volga...@networklab.ca> , "sr-users"
<sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 2:14:02 PM
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY
Hello,
you have to do record_route() for all NOTIFY requests -- there are new specs
requiring that (RFC 6665) and perhaps asterisk is following them.
If you look in the default kamailio.cfg for v4.2, inside route[WITHINDLG], then
you will see how it is done.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 11/03/15 14:22, Slava Bendersky wrote:
BQ_BEGIN
Hello Daniel,
Here fresh paste
http://fpaste.org/196616/42608006/
I see proper routing headers on SUBSCRIBE, but then NOTIFY loose it.
Slava.
From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <mico...@gmail.com>
To: "sr-users" <sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 5:31:51 PM
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY
Hello,
fpaste link doesn't show anything.
Can you check if the NOTIFY coming to Kamailio has two Route headers?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 10/03/15 18:44, Slava Bendersky wrote:
BQ_BEGIN
Hello Everyone,
Having issue with NOTIFY, is not forwarded to client properly.
asterisk ---> private kamailio public ----> soft client
http://fpaste.org/196257/99948714/
I see kamailio trying connect always with private IP to the client when NOTIFY
is come is in. Is this something to do with
rr_advertise_address ?
Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:4338]:
tcpconn_main_timeout(): connect 192.168.88.246:5064 failed (timeout)
Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:4362]:
tcpconn_main_timeout(): tcp_main: timeout for 0x7fbbb64e2800
Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [io_wait.h:610]:
io_watch_del(): DBG: io_watch_del (0x9dbf00, 33, -1, 0x10) fd_no=24 called
Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:4320]:
tcpconn_main_timeout(): tcp_main: entering timer for 0x7fbbb64eb6c0
(ticks=839577436, timeout=839634956 (3595 s), wr_timeout=839577436 (0 s)),
write queue: 798 bytes
Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:4338]:
tcpconn_main_timeout(): connect 192.168.88.246:5066 failed (timeout)
Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:4362]:
tcpconn_main_timeout(): tcp_main: timeout for 0x7fbbb64eb6c0
Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [io_wait.h:610]:
io_watch_del(): DBG: io_watch_del (0x9dbf00, 34, -1, 0x10) fd_no=23 called
Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1294]:
t_should_relay_response(): ->>>>>>>>> T_code=0, new_code=408
Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1812]:
relay_reply(): DEBUG: relay_reply: branch=0, save=0, relay=0 icode=0
Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: <core>
[mem/shm_mem.c:111]: _shm_resize(): WARNING:vqm_resize: resize(0) called
Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1294]:
t_should_relay_response(): ->>>>>>>>> T_code=0, new_code=408
Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1812]:
relay_reply(): DEBUG: relay_reply: branch=0, save=0, relay=0 icode=0
I have in configuration in WITHINDLG
if (is_method("NOTIFY")) {
record_route();
}
and in NATDETECT
if(is_method("INVITE|SUBSCRIBE|UPDATE|NOTIFY")) {
set_contact_alias();
}
Slava.
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015
Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
BQ_END
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015
Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
BQ_END
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015
Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com
BQ_END
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015
Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
BQ_END
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015
Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com
BQ_END
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015
Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
