Hello,
try without restore_mode auto if you want that restore_dlg to be 1.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 05/11/15 18:00, Efelin Novak wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I have a problem with To and From headers in 200 OK to BYE request.
> Their URI is doubled when leaving Kamailio.
>
> Incoming 200 OK:
> From : <sip:00421111@IP_ADDRESS>;tag=as017a2986
> To : <sip:00421222@IP_ADDRESS0>;tag=K7ryDgH2g7gFm
> Outgoing 200 OK:
> From : <sip:+421111@IP_ADDRESS><sip:+421111@IP_ADDRESS>;tag=as017a2986
> To : <sip:+421222@IP_ADDRESS><sip:+421222@IP_ADDRESS>;tag=K7ryDgH2g7gFm
>
> I'm using uac module to replace these headers in auto and dialog mode:
>
> modparam("uac", "restore_mode", "auto")
> modparam("uac", "restore_dlg", 1)
>
> append_fromtag is also set:
>
> modparam("rr", "append_fromtag", 1)
>
> When I run kamailio in debug mode I can see the function
> restore_uri_reply() is called twice:
>
> .
> .
> .
> 0(3133) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:1284]: parse_via_param():
> Found param type 234, <received> = <IP_ADDRESS>; state=6
> 0(3133) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:1284]: parse_via_param():
> Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK0bb8c5b2>; state=6
> 0(3133) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:1284]: parse_via_param():
> Found param type 235, <rport> = <5060>; state=16
> 0(3133) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:2672]: parse_via(): end of
> header reached, state=5
> 0(3133) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:513]: parse_headers():
> parse_headers: Via found, flags=62
> 0(3133) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:526]: parse_headers():
> parse_headers: this is the second via
> 0(3133) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_addr_spec.c:176]:
> parse_to_param(): DEBUG: add_param: tag=teHD72X67aQUm
> 0(3133) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_addr_spec.c:898]:
> parse_addr_spec(): end of header reached, state=29
> 0(3133) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:190]: get_hdr_field():
> DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [60]; uri=[sip:421222@IP_ADDRESS:5060]
> 0(3133) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:192]: get_hdr_field():
> DEBUG: to body [<sip:421222@IP_ADDRESS:5060>]
> 0(3133) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:170]: get_hdr_field():
> get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <103> <BYE>
> 0(3133) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:949]: t_reply_matching(): DEBUG:
> t_reply_matching: hash 10806 label 0 branch 0
> 0(3133) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1004]: t_reply_matching(): DEBUG:
> t_reply_matching: reply matched (T=0x220071b4)!
> 0(3133) DEBUG: tm [t_hooks.c:288]: run_trans_callbacks_internal():
> DBG: trans=0x220071b4, callback type 2, id 0 entered
> 0(3133) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_addr_spec.c:176]:
> parse_to_param(): DEBUG: add_param: tag=as46bccb83
> 0(3133) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_addr_spec.c:898]:
> parse_addr_spec(): end of header reached, state=29
> 0(3133) DEBUG: uac [replace.c:705]: restore_uri_reply(): removing
> <<sip:00421111@IP_ADDRESS>>
> 0(3133) DEBUG: uac [replace.c:714]: restore_uri_reply(): inserting
> <<sip:+421111@IP_ADDRESS>>
> 0(3133) DEBUG: uac [replace.c:705]: restore_uri_reply(): removing
> <<sip:00421222@IP_ADDRESS>>
> 0(3133) DEBUG: uac [replace.c:714]: restore_uri_reply(): inserting
> <<sip:+421222@IP_ADDRESS>>
> 0(3133) DEBUG: tm [t_hooks.c:288]: run_trans_callbacks_internal():
> DBG: trans=0x220071b4, callback type 2, id 0 entered
> 0(3133) DEBUG: uac [replace.c:705]: restore_uri_reply(): removing
> <<sip:00421111@IP_ADDRESS>>
> 0(3133) DEBUG: uac [replace.c:714]: restore_uri_reply(): inserting
> <<sip:+421111@IP_ADDRESS>>
> 0(3133) DEBUG: uac [replace.c:705]: restore_uri_reply(): removing
> <<sip:00421222@IP_ADDRESS>>
> 0(3133) DEBUG: uac [replace.c:714]: restore_uri_reply(): inserting
> <<sip:+421222@IP_ADDRESS>>
> .
> .
> .
>
> I think the problem is in registering a function restore_uris_reply()
> in callbacks in functions (both in replace.c of uac module)
> * void rr_checker(struct sip_msg *msg, str *r_param, void *cb_param)
> * static void replace_callback(struct dlg_cell *dlg, int type, struct
> dlg_cb_params *_params)
>
> Both of these callbacks are registered for BYE and ACK requests
> (INVITE request is using different callback), therefore
> running restore_uri_reply() twice.
> For testing purposes after I have removed the callback in rr_checker
> and recompile the uac module, To and From headers were OK.
>
> In my configuration I'm calling uac_replace_to in RELAY route:
> route[RELAY]
> {
>
> if ( !has_totag() ) {
> dlg_manage();
> uac_replace_to("$ru");
> }
>
> if (!t_relay())
> {
> sl_reply_error();
> }
> }
>
> So I think there is a bug in uac module, when one function is
> registered twice in callbacks for NON-INVITE requests.
>
> Or is there a problem with my configuration script?
>
> Can anyone point me to the direction how to solve this issue?
>
> Thank you
>
> Efelin
>
> Kamailio version: kamailio 4.4.0-dev6 (i386/linux) a66e22-dirty
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Book: SIP Routing With Kamailio - http://www.asipto.com
Kamailio Advanced Training, Nov 30-Dec 2, Berlin - http://asipto.com/kat
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
