Thanks Both Fred/Juha System is in production when i have a "free slot" i will check repeating each rule with lower priority. I think that would work as i expect
Thanks for your tips guys! Have a nice week Alberto 2016-05-06 13:44 GMT+02:00 Juha Heinanen <j...@tutpro.com>: > Alberto Sagredo writes: > > > > I do not know if its enough to add under same lcr_id or its better to add > > with different one and add several lcr_rule and lcr_rule_target > > > > Acordding to next_gw() function, what is better to be used? In my case. a > > primary providers is used and only a backup one for the momment. > > If your rules would be the same for both, then you can add a backup gw > to each rule with lower priority. You can also use defunct_gw() > function to make failing gws inactive for a period. > > If the rules are not the same, then in failure route you would need to > call load_gws() with another lcr id. > > -- Juha > > _______________________________________________ > SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list > sr-users@lists.sip-router.org > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >
_______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users