When I make internal call between 2 internal subscribers (yate softphones). The
subscriber B answeres, after all the Kamailio/rtpengine sends a 200ok reply to
the subscriber A,
but the softphone does not recognize it (it does not ACK it). I think it is
because of its SDP which the RTPENGINE replaced with it's one.
is it possible to instruct the RTPENGINE not to insert these extra lines or
should I use, say LUA, to remove these extra SDP lines.
What is the correct way here
On Saturday, May 7, 2016 11:36 PM, Dmitry <mbike200...@yahoo.com> wrote:
[SR-Users] question about RTPengine
Does it mean that rtpengine_manage() determine the session state itself? i.e it
is not needed to find out in the configuration file that INVITE contains SDP or
not because rtpengine_manage() determins internally what this INVITE is? am I
correct?
On Friday, May 6, 2016 5:52 PM, Alex Balashov <abalas...@evaristesys.com>
wrote:
It's just a description of stateful behaviour in relation to the SDP
offer-answer cycle.
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
1447 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 700
Atlanta, GA 30309
United States
Tel: +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) / +1-678-954-0671 (direct)
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/
Sent from my BlackBerry.
Original Message
From: Dmitry
Sent: Friday, May 6, 2016 07:43
To: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
Reply To: Dmitry
Subject: [SR-Users] question about RTPengine
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
