Hello, as I said before, the registrations have little to do with calls in sip, unless there is gruu in use.
Cheers, Daniel On 09/11/16 18:07, Slava Bendersky wrote: > Hello Everyone, > I cleared registrations and tried again and issue still present. > Client reply with 481. > > IP (tos 0x0, ttl 52, id 7731, offset 0, flags [none], proto UDP (17), > length 638) > client_pub_ip.49383 > proxy_pub_ip.llrp: [udp sum ok] UDP, length 610 > E..~.3..4...c....E.\.....j..SIP/2.0 481 Call Leg/Transaction Does Not > Exist > Via: > SIP/2.0/UDP > proxy_pub_ip:5084;branch=z9hG4bK3ea6.0c594485bff5b216f30af0f6172cb2b9.0 > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP > 10.18.130.24:5160;received=10.18.130.24;rport=5160;branch=z9hG4bKm80c0USSKv5Bp > From: "Test Extension" <sip:4...@sip.company.tld>;tag=SXt3DQQ90a0Dj > To: <sip:4300@client_pub_ip:49383>;tag=719973534 > Call-ID: 1abc150b-2141-1235-b5ad-5254003e39bb > CSeq: 99019404 BYE > Supported: replaces, path, eventlist > User-Agent: Grandstream Wave 1.2.2 > Allow: INVITE, ACK, OPTIONS, CANCEL, BYE, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO, > REFER, UPDATE, MESSAGE > Content-Length: 0 > > Slava. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *From: *"volga629" <volga...@skillsearch.ca> > *To: *mico...@gmail.com, "sr-users" <sr-users@lists.sip-router.org> > *Sent: *Wednesday, 9 November, 2016 12:28:32 > *Subject: *Re: [SR-Users] BYE dispatcher > > Hello Everyone, > I changed dispatcher algorithm from 0 to 1 and start working as > expected. Yes group 0 is accepted. > > route[DISPATCHER] { > if(!ds_select_dst("0", "1")) { > xlog("L_ERROR","ERROR: Proxy Mapping - Desitnation for $fd not > found...request dropped \n"); > sl_send_reply("404","Desitination Not Found \n"); > drop(); > } else { > $var(did) = 1; > } > if($var(did)) { > if (!t_relay()) { > sl_reply_error(); > } > #forward(); > } > > t_on_failure("DISPATCHER_FAIL_ROUTE"); > exit; > } > > Slava. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *From: *"Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <mico...@gmail.com> > *To: *"sr-users" <sr-users@lists.sip-router.org> > *Sent: *Wednesday, 9 November, 2016 04:33:33 > *Subject: *Re: [SR-Users] BYE dispatcher > > Hello, > > > On 08/11/16 20:42, Slava Bendersky wrote: > > Hello Everyone, > My setup is kamailio as proxy with few boxes of freeswitch in the > LAN. Having issue with BYE when extensions register on different > freeswitch boxes. Here are some trace of the call. > Not sure if this tag= miss match or routing. > > Dispatcher use group 0 with option 4 (round robin). > > is group value 0 accepted? I think this may create problems if a > function returns the group in the config as return code -- iirc, this > was changed maybe for lcr or permissions. > > On the other hand, the registrations are quite independent in SIP in > relation with calls. The BYE should be routed based on record-routing > to the freeswitch that was involved in routing initial INVITE, with no > relation to new registrations from end devices. Is the BYE sent to the > freeswitch that got the initial BYE. > > Cheers, > Daniel > -- > Daniel-Constantin Mierla > http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda > Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, Nov 28-30, 2016 - http://www.asipto.com > > _______________________________________________ > SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list > sr-users@lists.sip-router.org > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > > _______________________________________________ > SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list > sr-users@lists.sip-router.org > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, Nov 28-30, 2016 - http://www.asipto.com
_______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users