Am Di., 7. März 2023 um 17:42 Uhr schrieb Lucier, Bradley J <bradley.j.lucie...@purdue.edu>: > > > On Mar 7, 2023, at 1:52 AM, Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen <marc.nie...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > This tells me that generators should have their names end with "!”. > > I just went through all the procedures in this SRFI. Maybe the procedure > clamp-real-number should have been a procedure for internal use and not > exported. > > None of the other procedures are generators, per se, they return generators. > > I can’t see that, under your criteria, any of the procedure names in this > SRFI should end with “!”. > > Am I missing something? > > Brad
I'm sorry, Brad, for the misunderstanding. My remark was not about changing particular procedures in the SRFI but that it might be a good idea, in general, to adopt a naming convention of "!" for generators and accumulators so that imperative pitfalls could be spotted more easily.
