srfi-69  

Messages by Thread

• bug in reference implementation of HASH-TABLE-UPDATE! Taylor R Campbell
• fwd: [William D Clinger] patch file for SRFI 69 reference implementation Panu Kalliokoski
• hash-by-identity guarantees of change consistency? Panu Kalliokoski
  • Re: hash-by-identity guarantees of change consistency? Sebastian Egner
  • Re: hash-by-identity guarantees of change consistency? Panu Kalliokoski
  • Re: hash-by-identity guarantees of change consistency? Per Bothner
• Are make-hash-table-maker etc normative? Per Bothner
  • Re: Are make-hash-table-maker etc normative? Panu Kalliokoski
• Final SRFI 69: Basic hash tables srfi-editors
• SRFI 69 update David Van Horn
  • Re: SRFI 69 update Tony Garnock-Jones
  • hash-table-*/default (Re: SRFI 69 update) Panu Kalliokoski
  • Re: hash-table-*/default (Re: SRFI 69 update) Tony Garnock-Jones
  • Re: hash-table-*/default (Re: SRFI 69 update) Panu Kalliokoski
  • Re: hash-table-*/default (Re: SRFI 69 update) Tony Garnock-Jones
  • Re: hash-table-*/default (Re: SRFI 69 update) Panu Kalliokoski
• Drop ref/default, update!/default David Van Horn
• Mutating keys David Van Horn
  • Re: Mutating keys Panu Kalliokoski
  • Re: Mutating keys Alex Shinn
• Still on David's issues; SRFI 44 Panu Kalliokoski
  • Re: Still on David's issues; SRFI 44 bear
  • Re: Still on David's issues; SRFI 44 Panu Kalliokoski
  • Re: Still on David's issues; SRFI 44 bear
  • Re: Still on David's issues; SRFI 44 David Van Horn
• Comments on SRFI 69 David Van Horn
  • Re: Comments on SRFI 69 Panu Kalliokoski
  • Re: Comments on SRFI 69 Panu Kalliokoski
  • Re: Comments on SRFI 69 felix winkelmann
  • Re: Comments on SRFI 69 David Van Horn
  • Re: Comments on SRFI 69 felix winkelmann
  • Re: Comments on SRFI 69 David Van Horn
  • Re: Comments on SRFI 69 felix winkelmann
• Draft period extension, new draft David Van Horn
• Re: error in hash table reference implementation Panu Kalliokoski
  • Re: error in hash table reference implementation Panu
• should hash function upper bound be exclusive? Per Bothner
  • Re: should hash function upper bound be exclusive? bear
  • Re: should hash function upper bound be exclusive? Per Bothner
  • Re: should hash function upper bound be exclusive? Panu Kalliokoski
• hash for eq? Per Bothner
  • Re: hash for eq? Panu Kalliokoski
  • Re: hash for eq? Per Bothner
• Re: Responses to your comments Sven . Hartrumpf
  • Re: Responses to your comments Panu
• SRFI-69: hash-table-size Sven . Hartrumpf
  • Re: SRFI-69: hash-table-size Scott G. Miller
  • Re: SRFI-69: hash-table-size David Van Horn
  • Re: SRFI-69: hash-table-size Panu
• New revision, near finalization David Van Horn
• Handling of default values Panu