srfi-72  

Messages by Thread

• SRFI 72 sample implementation incorrect Daphne Preston-Kendal
  • Re: SRFI 72 sample implementation incorrect Arthur A. Gleckler
  • Re: SRFI 72 sample implementation incorrect Zhu Zihao
  • Re: SRFI 72 sample implementation incorrect Arthur A. Gleckler
• Link to reference implementation is broken Jeronimo Pellegrini (via srfi-72 list)
  • Re: Link to reference implementation is broken Arthur A. Gleckler
• Broken links Vladimir Nikishkin
  • Re: Broken links Arthur A. Gleckler
  • Re: Broken links Vladimir Nikishkin
  • Re: Broken links Arthur A. Gleckler
  • Re: Broken links Vladimir Nikishkin
  • Re: Broken links Arthur A. Gleckler
• Re: Expanding to uses of unquote, unquote-slicing AndrevanTonder
• Lazy/eager Andre van Tonder
• Final SRFI 72: Hygienic macros. srfi-editors
• Update to SRFI-72 draft Andre van Tonder
• DrScheme version with source location tracking Andre van Tonder
  • Re: DrScheme version with source location tracking Per Bothner
  • Re: DrScheme version with source location tracking Andre van Tonder
• Update to SRFI 72 Andre van Tonder
  • Re: Update to SRFI 72 (Sorry I'm lost) Keith Wright
  • Re: Update to SRFI 72 (Sorry I'm lost) Panu Kalliokoski
  • Re: Update to SRFI 72 (Sorry I'm lost) Andre van Tonder
• loss of abstraction Andrew Wilcox
  • Re: loss of abstraction Michael Sperber
  • Re: loss of abstraction bear
  • Re: loss of abstraction Michael Sperber
  • Re: loss of abstraction Andre van Tonder
  • Re: loss of abstraction Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
  • Re: loss of abstraction Andre van Tonder
  • Re: loss of abstraction Alan Watson
  • Re: loss of abstraction Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
  • Re: loss of abstraction Alan Watson
  • Re: loss of abstraction Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
  • Re: loss of abstraction Michael Sperber
  • Re: loss of abstraction Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
  • Re: loss of abstraction Michael Sperber
  • Re: loss of abstraction Andre van Tonder
  • Re: loss of abstraction Andre van Tonder
  • Re: loss of abstraction Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
  • Re: loss of abstraction Andre van Tonder
  • Re: loss of abstraction Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
  • Re: loss of abstraction Jens Axel Søgaard
  • Re: loss of abstraction Alan Watson
  • Re: loss of abstraction Jens Axel Søgaard
  • Re: loss of abstraction Alan Watson
  • Re: loss of abstraction bear
  • Re: loss of abstraction Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
  • Re: loss of abstraction Panu Kalliokoski
  • Re: loss of abstraction Michael Sperber
  • Re: loss of abstraction bear
  • Re: loss of abstraction Panu Kalliokoski
• Opaque thought experiment Andre van Tonder
  • Re: Opaque thought experiment Matthias Neubauer
  • Re: Opaque thought experiment Andre van Tonder
• question on the opaque syntax object debate Andrew Wilcox
  • Re: question on the opaque syntax object debate Andre van Tonder
  • Re: question on the opaque syntax object debate Jens Axel Søgaard
  • Re: question on the opaque syntax object debate Michael Sperber
  • Re: question on the opaque syntax object debate Matthias Neubauer
  • Re: question on the opaque syntax object debate bear
  • Re: question on the opaque syntax object debate Andre van Tonder
  • Re: question on the opaque syntax object debate Michael Sperber
  • Re: question on the opaque syntax object debate bear
  • Re: question on the opaque syntax object debate Panu Kalliokoski
  • Re: question on the opaque syntax object debate Michael Sperber
  • Re: question on the opaque syntax object debate bear
  • Re: question on the opaque syntax object debate Michael Sperber
  • Re: question on the opaque syntax object debate Andre van Tonder
• Connection between runtime and expand-time Panu Kalliokoski
• The power of Lists Keith Wright
  • Re: The power of Lists Jens Axel Søgaard
  • Re: The power of Lists Keith Wright
  • Re: The power of Lists Michael Sperber
  • Re: The power of Lists Andre van Tonder
  • Re: The power of Lists Michael Sperber
  • Re: The power of Lists Andre van Tonder
  • Re: The power of Lists Andre van Tonder
• Namespaces Andre van Tonder
  • Re: Namespaces Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
  • Re: Namespaces Martin Gasbichler
  • Re: Namespaces Andre van Tonder
  • Re: Namespaces Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
  • Re: Namespaces Andre van Tonder
  • Re: Namespaces Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
  • Re: Namespaces Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
  • Re: Namespaces Matthias Neubauer
  • Re: Namespaces Matthias Neubauer
  • Re: Namespaces Martin Gasbichler
  • Re: Namespaces Matthias Neubauer
  • Re: Namespaces Andre van Tonder
  • Re: Namespaces Martin Gasbichler
  • Re: Namespaces Keith Wright
  • Re: Namespaces Keith Wright
• begin-for-syntax, begin-for-load should be in this SRFI Keith Wright
  • Re: begin-for-syntax, begin-for-load should be in this SRFI Andre van Tonder
• Opaque syntax objects Michael Sperber
  • Re: Opaque syntax objects felix winkelmann
  • Re: Opaque syntax objects Jens Axel Søgaard
  • Re: Opaque syntax objects Andre van Tonder
  • Re: Opaque syntax objects Michael Sperber
  • Re: Opaque syntax objects Jens Axel Søgaard
  • Re: Opaque syntax objects Andre van Tonder
  • Re: Opaque syntax objects bear
  • Re: Opaque syntax objects Keith Wright
  • Re: Opaque syntax objects Michael Sperber
  • Re: Opaque syntax objects Jens Axel Søgaard
  • Re: Opaque syntax objects Keith Wright
  • Re: Opaque syntax objects Andre van Tonder
  • Re: Opaque syntax objects Jens Axel Søgaard
  • Re: Opaque syntax objects Andre van Tonder
  • Re: Opaque syntax objects Jens Axel Søgaard
  • Re: Opaque syntax objects Andre van Tonder
  • Re: Opaque syntax objects Jens Axel Søgaard
  • Re: Opaque syntax objects Andre van Tonder
  • Re: Opaque syntax objects Jens Axel Søgaard
  • Re: Opaque syntax objects Michael Sperber
  • Re: Opaque syntax objects [course positions] Per Bothner
  • Re: Opaque syntax objects Andre van Tonder
  • Re: Opaque syntax objects Andre van Tonder
  • Re: Opaque syntax objects Andre van Tonder
  • Re: Opaque syntax objects Michael Sperber
  • Re: Opaque syntax objects Andre van Tonder
  • Re: Opaque syntax objects Andre van Tonder
  • Re: Opaque syntax objects Andre van Tonder
  • Re: Opaque syntax objects Jens Axel Søgaard
  • Re: Opaque syntax objects Andre van Tonder
• Update available Andre van Tonder
• hygiene when using multiple instances of a macro..? Panu Kalliokoski
  • Re: hygiene when using multiple instances of a macro..? Andre van Tonder
  • Re: hygiene when using multiple instances of a macro..? Panu
  • Re: hygiene when using multiple instances of a macro..? Andre van Tonder
  • Re: hygiene when using multiple instances of a macro..? Keith Wright
  • Re: hygiene when using multiple instances of a macro..? Andre van Tonder
  • Re: hygiene when using multiple instances of a macro..? Panu A. Kalliokoski
  • Re: hygiene when using multiple instances of a macro..? Andre van Tonder
• Re: How many arguments to a macro transformer? Andre van Tonder
  • Re: How many arguments to a macro transformer? Andre van Tonder
  • Re: How many arguments to a macro transformer? Keith Wright
  • Re: How many arguments to a macro transformer? felix winkelmann
  • Re: How many arguments to a macro transformer? Andre van Tonder
  • Re: How many arguments to a macro transformer? Keith Wright