On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 09:07:47AM -0600, Dave Dykstra wrote: > The best overall > solution is to use ssh-agent on a secured client machine rather than > passphrase-less keys, because that also protects against physical seizure > of the client machine, although most of us don't worry about that. Oh yeah, it also protects against somebody picking up and using the key from a backup copy. - Dave Dykstra
- autologin considered harmful? Jeff Turner
- Re: autologin considered harmful? Charles Curley
- Re: autologin considered harmful? Jeff Turner
- Re: autologin considered harmful? Dave Dykstra
- Re: autologin considered harmful? Dave Dykstra
- Re: autologin considered harmful? Greg A. Woods
- Re: autologin considered harmful? Jeff Turner
- Re: autologin considered harmful? owner-ssh
- Re: autologin considered harmful? Greg A. Woods
- RE: autologin considered harmful? Admin
- RE: autologin considered harmful? Jeff Turner
- RE: autologin considered harmful? Roeland Meyer
- RE: autologin considered harmful? Jeff Turner
- Re: autologin considered harmful? Dave Dykstra
- Re: autologin considered harmful? Dave Dykstra
