No, it's not any of the Triplex's. This one is a 2-10-10-2. This one was actually used succesfully. this one had all it's exhuast routed to the same stack. ;] http://www.northeast.railfan.net/images/tr_vgn802.jpg Just trying again... ;] Trot, the fox who can still see it! On Sat, 28 Oct 2000, Sam Evans wrote: > I can't get the pix but if its the Virginian Triplex, I believe the Erie > has some too. An electric brass model in 1/4" has been produced because > my employer bought one! If someone can meke a working live steam model > of a Hagans system loco then the Triplex out to be an attainable if > expensive challenge. > > Sam E /\_/\ TrotFox \ Always remember, ( o o ) AKA Landon Solomon \ "There is a >\./< [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ third alternative."
- Re: compounding and reheating (was Why won't this work?) Jeanne Baer
- Re: compounding and reheating (was Why won't this work?) WaltSwartz
- Re: compounding and reheating (was Why won't this work?) WaltSwartz
- Re: compounding and reheating (was Why won't this work?) Landon Solomon
- Re: compounding and reheating (was Why won't this work?) Landon Solomon
- Re: compounding and reheating (was Why won't this work?) Trent Dowler
- Re: compounding and reheating (was Why won't this work?) Sam Evans
- Re: compounding and reheating (was Why won't this work?) Sam Evans
- Re: compounding and reheating (was Why won't this work?) Sam Evans
- Re: compounding and reheating (was Why won't this work?) Sam Evans
- Re: compounding and reheating (was Why won't this work?) trotfox
- Re: compounding and reheating (was Why won't this work?) Jeanne Baer
- Re: compounding and reheating (was Why won't this work?) WaltSwartz
- Re: compounding and reheating (was Why won't this work?) Susan Parker