On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 06:09:24AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: > Given we use git it doesn't seem a great match. > If the Fedora facility do upgrade to the newer Transifex, then maybe > that's going to be easier for us as we will not need to make any bzr to > git transformation and use 2 separate account systems, etc...
I just checked on this, it's in progress. I'll send along the Trac ticket when it's generated so anyone can watch it. Diego is working on the 0.7 upgrade, and he needs a db dump that cannot happen until after Fedora 12 Alpha freeze (Fedora Infrastructure freezes changes and certain activities around release times.) That would make it "after a few weeks", since Alpha was pushed back a week. He asked that we file a ticket on Transifex.org that explains what we would be looking for in a l10n workflow so that it fits with the SSSD development model. I can file the ticket, but need a solid idea of what SSSD would want (I'll run the same concept by the rest of FreeIPA, figuring there it's identical?) These would be features that could appear in 0.8 if they do not exist currently in a way you can use. Another idea, btw, is to use the instance at Transifex.net instead of translate.fedoraproject.org. It depends, I suppose, on which group you want to get a new account (presuming they don't have a Transifex.net account yet) -- Fedora l10n community who don't have a Transifex.net account, or non-Fedora l10n community who don't have a Fedora Account. :) In the end, I think the effect on SSSD is the same, but it may be different in the longer term depending on where you see the bulk and growth of your l10n community to be. - Karsten -- Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Community Gardener http://quaid.fedorapeople.org AD0E0C41
pgpfvcvG6OebM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ sssd-devel mailing list sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
