-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 01/11/2010 10:07 AM, Tomas Mraz wrote: > On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 11:54 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> Address https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/349 >> >> >> After a bit of thought, I decided to break this into two separate >> patches to make it more clear. New patches attached. >> >> Patch 0002: Remove the explicit defaults where they're unneeded. >> Patch 0003: Implement the mandatory flag as in the previous patch. > > Is the mandatory flag really the way how to proceed with the authconfig? > > Will there be a short summary of the Friday authconfig SSSD UI meeting > posted somewhere? >
Yeah, as I mentioned in my other reply, I think this is no longer the correct approach. I'm withdrawing this and I want to work from the results of that meeting. I will ping the other attendants about the notes. - -- Stephen Gallagher RHCE 804006346421761 Delivering value year after year. Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors. http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAktLQUMACgkQeiVVYja6o6PlkgCfaAgFUW+ObgQpSUucr8u3YqFt MegAoLH2rjJYj26GbnAimZa26Kf9Sl37 =3acF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ sssd-devel mailing list sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel