-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 This patch should fix a segfault in failover code introduced by my recent hostname expiration patch.
I didn't realize that when using SRV records, server->common == NULL is legal as we don't have the server name resolved yet. The first hunk in the patch is completely unrelated to the crash. But I think it is correct, server->common == NULL should never mean that the server is resolved. Should I split the hunk (at least for stable branches sake) even if it is one-liner? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk10rCgACgkQHsardTLnvCV7AwCcD3S6hlJIMnF3xxxtkaON/2Gr IkQAn0ZFtnsyH+YOBBuM7SmwmfAV+o0P =V/Kz -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From 5e92c68d48cf46c2d4a8e0967024d3b685ff9f8f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jakub Hrozek <jhro...@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 10:52:19 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Prevent segfault in failover code --- src/providers/fail_over.c | 5 +++-- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/providers/fail_over.c b/src/providers/fail_over.c index a09a409..37ffe26 100644 --- a/src/providers/fail_over.c +++ b/src/providers/fail_over.c @@ -312,7 +312,7 @@ get_server_status(struct fo_server *server) time_t timeout; if (server->common == NULL) - return SERVER_NAME_RESOLVED; + return SERVER_NAME_NOT_RESOLVED; DEBUG(7, ("Status of server '%s' is '%s'\n", SERVER_NAME(server), str_server_status(server->common->server_status))); @@ -353,7 +353,8 @@ get_port_status(struct fo_server *server) server->port_status = PORT_NEUTRAL; server->last_status_change.tv_sec = tv.tv_sec; - if (STATUS_DIFF(server->common, tv) > HOSTNAME_RESOLVE_TIMEOUT) { + if (server->common != NULL && + STATUS_DIFF(server->common, tv) > HOSTNAME_RESOLVE_TIMEOUT) { DEBUG(4, ("Reseting the server status of '%s'\n", SERVER_NAME(server))); fo_set_server_status(server, SERVER_NAME_NOT_RESOLVED); -- 1.7.4
0001-Prevent-segfault-in-failover-code.patch.sig
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ sssd-devel mailing list sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel