> On 07/25/2011 01:16 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > I'm not sure whether we're considering this acked or nacked. Are we > > planning to push these patches as they are now, or should we be waiting > > for the aforementioned wrapper around sysdb_store_group()? > > I think the wrapper is a more readable solution. I've implemented it in > the attached patches.
Ack to both Jan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ sssd-devel mailing list sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
