While reviewing Jan's sysdb patches I noticed that a call to sysdb_attrs_add_uint32() I added recently is wrong.
The reason the code worked and the compiler did not complain was simple - there's only one place that calls sdap_store_group_with_gid() and it passes group_attrs for mem_ctx. If we ever reused sdap_store_group_with_gid() with a different memory context it would probably crash and burn. Sorry about the inconvenience.
From 5989679bc934b7fc6665826473ffee00b4ab33fb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jakub Hrozek <jhro...@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 17:51:37 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Wrong paramater to sysdb_attrs_add_uint32 --- src/providers/ldap/sdap_async_accounts.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/providers/ldap/sdap_async_accounts.c b/src/providers/ldap/sdap_async_accounts.c index 581abc6..40e1215 100644 --- a/src/providers/ldap/sdap_async_accounts.c +++ b/src/providers/ldap/sdap_async_accounts.c @@ -678,7 +678,7 @@ sdap_store_group_with_gid(TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx, /* make sure that non-posix (empty or explicit gid=0) groups have the * gidNumber set to zero even if updating existing group */ if (!posix_group) { - ret = sysdb_attrs_add_uint32(mem_ctx, SYSDB_GIDNUM, 0); + ret = sysdb_attrs_add_uint32(group_attrs, SYSDB_GIDNUM, 0); if (ret) { DEBUG(2, ("Could not set explicit GID 0 for %s\n", name)); return ret; -- 1.7.6
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ sssd-devel mailing list sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel