On 01/10/2012 10:17 AM, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 10:49 +0100, Jan Zelený wrote: > >> I also have one cosmetic proposal for patch #0009: >> >> 1) On line 452 use MC_ALIGN64 instead of (n_elem + 7) & (~7) > The reason I did not use MC_ALIGN64 is that I thought it would be > confusing as n_elem is not a pointer but a counter. > I'll change the code and add more explanation on why using MC_ALIGN64 is > ok there. > > Simo. > As there any SELinux implication with this feature?
-- Thank you, Dmitri Pal Sr. Engineering Manager IPA project, Red Hat Inc. ------------------------------- Looking to carve out IT costs? www.redhat.com/carveoutcosts/ _______________________________________________ sssd-devel mailing list sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
