> On Jan 17, 2012, at 11:36 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 22:27 +0000, JR Aquino wrote: > >> Feedback for the patch: > >> > >> 15:07 < AMM:#freeipa> So what I'm noticing is that when I would expect > >> it to fail (after x ammount of time) and I login, it just takes a > >> little while longer to login. Which probably means its pulling down > >> more data 15:14 < JrAquino:#freeipa> AMM: an unacceptibally long time? > >> 15:23 < AMM:#freeipa> not awesome 15:23 < AMM:#freeipa> maybe 10 -15 > >> seconds > >> > >> This delay doesn't manifest during other time periods... is it possible > >> that the search that sssd is doing is unnecessary? > > > > JR, please provide more information when you report a complaint. "My > > colleague says that when he does stuff, it takes longer than usual" > > isn't useful. > > > > I'm assuming that he's claiming that with this patch, he's seeing a > > delay somewhere? That's actually impossible. The only effect of this > > patch is to potentially *reduce* the number of lookups we do against the > > server. (If the server has more results than we can read in a single > > lookup, we'd go back again to get the rest). > > Very sorry about that. Wont happen again. > > It appears /not/ to be an issue. > > And: > > ACK to the patch
Ack++ Jan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ sssd-devel mailing list sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel