On 03/30/2012 09:34 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote: > On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 01:23:10PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote: >> On 28.3.2012 17:33, Simo Sorce wrote: >>> On Wed, 2012-03-28 at 10:09 -0400, Jakub Hrozek wrote: >>>> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 10:05:04AM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote: >>>>> 2. store the pair (user,domainname) in the in-memory cache as well >>>>> - find domain name in in-memory cache >>>>> - if not found then perform initgroups, go into provider, ... >>>>> >>>>> - find default options in in-memory cache >>>>> - if not found then go into provider, ... >>>>> >>>>> Advantage - faster, easier to implement >>>>> Disadvantage - bigger memory dump if the sudo is used by many users >>>>> >>>>> I hope that this is understandable enough. >>>>> >>>> The cache places a timer on the cached data, so the memory is only >>>> occupied for a short and defined period of time. I think the advantages >>>> outweight the slightly bigger memory consumption, so I would prefer this >>>> option. >>> Why this data is not simply stored in LDB ? >>> >>> Simo. >>> >> I'm sorry, what data do you mean? The (user,domain) pair? > We talked with Simo recently about abandoning the memory cache completely
Which memory cache you are referring to here? > in favor of just performing LDB lookups(*) in order to avoid another cache > level. Sorry, I just didn't catch you online yesterday to explain. I'll > send you the IRC log in an e-mail. > > (*) unless the performance regresses drastically > _______________________________________________ > sssd-devel mailing list > sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org > https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel -- Thank you, Dmitri Pal Sr. Engineering Manager IPA project, Red Hat Inc. ------------------------------- Looking to carve out IT costs? www.redhat.com/carveoutcosts/ _______________________________________________ sssd-devel mailing list sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
