On Sun, 2012-04-22 at 09:30 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-04-21 at 10:31 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 15:01 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2012-04-13 at 12:34 +0200, Jan Zelený wrote:
> > > So in the default case:
> > > ldap_idmap_range_min = 100,001
> > > ldap_idmap_range_max = 2,000,100,000
> > > ldap_idmap_range_size = 100,000
> > > 
> > > 
> > > So what this means is that we will have 2000 available slices each
> > > capable of managing up to 100,000 IDs.
> > 
> > Clearly my math skills are failing me, because that should have been
> > 20,000 available slices managing up to 100,000 IDs. This should be
> > sufficient for most deployments and provide a very small window of hash
> > collisions for the slice numbering.
> 
> /In FreeIPA we have 10k slices of 200k IDs, can we use the same ? 


Sure, makes sense to me.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel

Reply via email to