On Sun, 2012-04-22 at 09:30 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Sat, 2012-04-21 at 10:31 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 15:01 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > On Fri, 2012-04-13 at 12:34 +0200, Jan Zelený wrote: > > > So in the default case: > > > ldap_idmap_range_min = 100,001 > > > ldap_idmap_range_max = 2,000,100,000 > > > ldap_idmap_range_size = 100,000 > > > > > > > > > So what this means is that we will have 2000 available slices each > > > capable of managing up to 100,000 IDs. > > > > Clearly my math skills are failing me, because that should have been > > 20,000 available slices managing up to 100,000 IDs. This should be > > sufficient for most deployments and provide a very small window of hash > > collisions for the slice numbering. > > /In FreeIPA we have 10k slices of 200k IDs, can we use the same ?
Sure, makes sense to me.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ sssd-devel mailing list sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel