On 11/18/2012 11:58 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
[PATCH 1/2] SYSDB: Use the add_string convenience functions for managing
ghost user attribute

Using the convenience function instead of low-level ldb calls makes the
code more compact and more readable.

[PATCH 2/2] LDAP: Only convert direct parents' ghost attribute to member

https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1612

I'm not too happy with the originalDN attribute exposed in the
sysdb_add_user/store_user functions but it seemed like a better way
than grabbing the attribute from the extended attributes in the "attrs"
array. At the same time, we need to adjust the attributes during all user
adds, not just during sdap_store_user from the LDAP provider. Ideas on
how to make the process cleaner are welcome.

This patch changes the handling of ghost attributes when saving the
actual user entry. Instead of always linking all groups that contained
the ghost attribute with the new user entry, the original member
attributes are now saved in the group object and the user entry is only
linked with its direct parents.

As the member attribute is compared against the originalDN of the user,
if either the originalDN or the originalMember attributes are missing,
the user object is linked with all the groups as a fallback.

The original member attributes are only saved if the LDAP schema
supports nesting.

@@ -235,6 +236,19 @@ sdap_process_ghost_members(struct sysdb_attrs *attrs,
         return ret;
     }


Hi,
just one nitpick.

+    if (store_original_member) {
+        DEBUG(SSSDBG_TRACE_FUNC, ("The group has %d members\n", 
memberel->num_values));
+        for (i = 0; i < memberel->num_values; i++) {
+            ret = sysdb_attrs_add_string(sysdb_attrs, SYSDB_ORIG_MEMBER,
+                                        (const char *) 
memberel->values[i].data);
+            if (ret) {
+                DEBUG(SSSDBG_OP_FAILURE, ("Could not add member [%s]\n",
+                    (const char *) memberel->values[i].data));

      wrong indentation^^

+                return ret;
+            }
+        }
+    }
+

Otherwise it looks good to me.

_______________________________________________
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel

Reply via email to