Caught by RHEL Coverity scans. Luckily all the bug would have caused is a spurious DEBUG message.
>From ab11c0a6d32ae3981af6bc703d5a7460d7d42718 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jakub Hrozek <jhro...@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 13:28:59 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] monitor: Add forgotten break
--- src/monitor/monitor.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/src/monitor/monitor.c b/src/monitor/monitor.c index 8098a583068f3d2b483972b0c6119e1508c862d3..cf8479c4b4e0b9c52ae6862793d6daef4edf353d 100644 --- a/src/monitor/monitor.c +++ b/src/monitor/monitor.c @@ -516,6 +516,7 @@ static void tasks_check_handler(struct tevent_context *ev, case ENXIO: DEBUG(1,("Child (%s) not responding! (yet)\n", svc->name)); + break; default: /* TODO: should we tear it down ? */ -- 1.8.2.1
_______________________________________________ sssd-devel mailing list sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel