On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 01:15:02PM +0200, Benjamin Franzke wrote: > Hi Sumit, > > Should the spec file also include an /etc/alternatives integration, like > cifs-utils has? > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/cifs-utils.git/tree/cifs-utils.spec#n90
yes, my plan was to include this into the spec file for the Fedora package. I thought for the upstream spec file this is not needed since cifs-utils upstream does not use it either. On the other hand I guess the upstream spec file will be used mostly by Fedora/RHEL users to replace the distributed SSSD packages. So it makes sense to include it upstream as well. I'll send a new patch. bye, Sumit > > > 2013/10/14 Sumit Bose <sb...@redhat.com> > > > and now with the patch included :-) > > > > On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 01:08:39PM +0200, Sumit Bose wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > as promised I created the spec file changes to include the cifs-utils > > > plugin into the sssd-client package on Fedora and RHEL platforms where > > > recent cifs-utils are available. > > > > > > bye, > > > Sumit > > > > _______________________________________________ > > sssd-devel mailing list > > sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org > > https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel > > > > _______________________________________________ sssd-devel mailing list sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
