On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 15:15 +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote: > On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 11:45:17AM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: > > ehlo, > > > > While I was working on symbol maps for ding_libs, I found out two > > declarations > > of function were misspelled in the public header file. It looks like nobody > > used this function, because symbols in library are correct > > > > [root@unused-4-233 ~]# objdump -T /usr/lib64/libcollection.so | grep > > col_insert_unsi > > 0000000000006d50 g DF .text 000000000000003b Base > > col_insert_unsigned_property_with_ref > > 0000000000006af0 g DF .text 000000000000003a Base > > col_insert_unsigned_property > > > > Problem is fixed with simple replacement s/ng/gn/ > > > > I can see a problem. I am not sure if we should bump SONAME, > > because ABI of library is not changed, but API is technically > > changed in imcompatible way (two functions were removed and two functions > > were > > added). It looks like nobody used this functions, because it is impossible > > to > > link program with wrong declaration. > > > > LS > > Nice catch. I would personally play it safe and bump the SONAME. Yes, > this will neccessitate a rebuild of SSSD and GSSProxy, but hiding a fix > is not nice practice, I think.
No need, add the new symbol as an alias of the other, and keep the old too, this will prevent breaking the ABI. In the headers file add a define the redefines the old symbol to the new name so all new built software references the right one, this will prevent breaking the API. Simo. -- Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York _______________________________________________ sssd-devel mailing list sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel