On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 11:16:01AM +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote: > On Fri, 04 Apr 2014, Jakub Hrozek wrote: > >>>* Presumably, the libsss_ad.so gpo code links successfully because it is > >>>pulling in a library (which is internally pulling in libsamba-security), > >>> but I'm not sure which library that is. Any ideas? > >>>* Is there a better solution for getting the gpo tests to link? > >>Better solution will be to move necessary functions in upstream > >>to public samba libraries. Your solution can be temporary. > >> > >>bool string_to_sid(struct dom_sid *sidout, const char *sidstr); > >>int dom_sid_string_buf(const struct dom_sid *sid, char *buf, int buflen); > >>bool dom_sid_equal(const struct dom_sid *sid1, const struct dom_sid *sid2); > > > >That's a good question for Samba developers. Linking with a private library > >is always a risk. Was there any conversation already about exporting these > >functions with Guenther maybe? > > > >The alternative would be to add a configure time option > >(--with-samba-libraries?) that distributions could use to specify where > >the private Samba libraries are. > > > >A last-resort alternative for us would be to re-implement the functions > >ourselves. > We have these implemented in FreeIPA's daemons/ipa-kdb/ipa_kdb_mspac.c > > You can take and use them, they originally came from Samba too. > > Not sure it is worth creating a separate library since it would still > depend on a struct dom_sid from samba.
See my other mail, I think this functionality is already implemented within SSSD. bye, Sumit > > -- > / Alexander Bokovoy > _______________________________________________ > sssd-devel mailing list > sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org > https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel _______________________________________________ sssd-devel mailing list sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
