On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 11:50:35AM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
> On 04/03/2014 06:54 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 12:45:01PM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
> >>On 03/23/2014 10:08 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >>>Hi,
> >>>
> >>>I've been working on re-adding a public DBus API to SSSD lately, based
> >>>on Stephen's InfoPipe code. While I'm not finished yet, the interface is
> >>>also important to Pavel's OpenLMI thesis, so I'll be sending the patches
> >>>for review as the individual subtasks are finished and rebased on top of
> >>>Stef's recent patches.
> >>>
> >>>Attached are two patches that I think are ready to be reviewed and
> >>>merged with some minor exceptions or questions. The review would be a
> >>>good opportunity to solve those.
> >>>
> >>>[PATCH 1/2] IFP: Re-add the InfoPipe server
> >>>This commit only adds the responder and the needed plumbing. No DBus
> >>>related code is in yet.
> >>>
> >>>With this patch, I was wondering whether to build the code by default,
> >>>or only when --enable-experimental-features is set until the whole
> >>>feature is finished?
> >>
> >>I don't think this is necessary.
> >>
> >>>
> >>>  Also, with the current code, all responders spawn a client socket now,
> >>>but this responder listens on the system bus instead. I created
> >>>https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2290 for this purpose -- Pavel,
> >>>feel free to take it.
> >>
> >>Will do.
> >>
> >>>
> >>>[PATCH 2/2] IFP: Connect to the system bus
> >>>Adds the possibility for the InfoPipe responder to connect to the system
> >>>bus. At the moment, only a dummy method "Ping" is provided. The method
> >>>only accepts a single string parameter that has to be 'ping'.
> >>>
> >>>To test, you can call the Ping method like this:
> >>>dbus-send --print-reply --system --dest=org.freedesktop.sssd.infopipe
> >>>/org/freedesktop/sssd/infopipe org.freedesktop.sssd.infopipe.Ping
> >>>'string:Ping'
> >>>
> >>>Or test that the code can catch wrong options:
> >>>  dbus-send --print-reply --system --dest=org.freedesktop.sssd.infopipe
> >>>/org/freedesktop/sssd/infopipe org.freedesktop.sssd.infopipe.Ping
> >>>'string:sdf'
> >>>
> >>>I'll be sending next round of patches later this week. Hopefully this
> >>>would unblock Pavel's work.
> >>
> >>Hi,
> >>Patch 1:
> >>
> >>>+%package dbus
> >>>+Summary: The DBus responder if the SSSD
> >>                                ^ typo
> >>>+Group: Applications/System
> >>>+License: GPLv3+
> >>>+Requires: sssd-common = %{version}-%{release}
> >>
> >>Also I think we should use D-Bus in package description (and in
> >>general) -- that's the correct spelling.
> >>
> >>>+    <refnamediv id='name'>
> >>>+        <refname>sssd-ifp</refname>
> >>>+        <refpurpose>SSSD InfoPipe provider</refpurpose>
> >>                                      ^ responder
> >>>+    </refnamediv>
> >>
> >>Ack to the code.
> >>
> >>Patch 2:
> >>Ack.
> >>
> >>Nice work.
> >
> >Thanks for the review. Two new patches are attached and one is a
> >completely new one that fixes a typo in an old code that was still
> >around (which is why I'm sending it separately).
> 
> Ack to all.

Pushed to master:
    8214510f125879c3b1d247f2ce981ee20b5375d1
    cb4d5b588e704114b7090678752d33512baa718e
    03fb48fdaa7ed95ecb38ecc43a6d221ff2cfd950
_______________________________________________
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel

Reply via email to