On 04/29/2014 03:24 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Hi,
we've been keeping the sssd-1-11 branch fairly conservative recently,
mostly as a precaution to not break downstreams that consume sssd-1-11,
like RHEL.
But some relatively larger features, such as the InfoPipe responder,
need to be backported to sssd-1-11 (and by extension to RHEL-6) now. One
large difference between master and sssd-1-11 are the DEBUG messages and
I'd like to propose that we backport the new DEBUG messages to sssd-1-11
and mass-convert the callers the same way we did in master.
I think backporting the DEBUG messages change would be relatively
low-risk, as the messages don't generally affect the behaviour of the
daemon.
The big downside of course is that we break git-blame and cause a bit of
churn in sssd-1-11. But I think this downside it outweighted by not
having to backport each and every DEBUG message from patches we'll be
pulling in from master to sssd-1-11, which is all the SBUS changes Stef
did recently and also all the work on the IFP responder.
The next step would be backporting the SBUS changes, but I'd prefer a
separate thread about those.
Thoughts?
+1
_______________________________________________
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
