Hi, a trivial patch, but the include made me go searching through the ldap_child code for a place where we might use some PAM-related code :-)
>From 710b2124a7e2b8d9badde753c8f0cd5dcbb8e5ba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jakub Hrozek <jhro...@redhat.com> Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2014 10:10:07 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] LDAP: Remove useless include
Using a PAM include file in an LDAP child is confusing. --- src/providers/ldap/ldap_child.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/providers/ldap/ldap_child.c b/src/providers/ldap/ldap_child.c index f7f8d1d2eab3f66fe4f7d09e50458b495739c1d2..a1e250c46fe1052849ab66f2d3158b7c7d143c51 100644 --- a/src/providers/ldap/ldap_child.c +++ b/src/providers/ldap/ldap_child.c @@ -27,8 +27,6 @@ #include <sys/stat.h> #include <popt.h> -#include <security/pam_modules.h> - #include "util/util.h" #include "util/sss_krb5.h" #include "util/child_common.h" -- 1.9.3
_______________________________________________ sssd-devel mailing list sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
