On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 03:42:47PM +0200, Pavel Reichl wrote: > >>>> From 3adee0c2ff207eef7c2edcfed80eb47754570210 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > >>>>From: Pavel Reichl <prei...@redhat.com> > >>>>Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 05:03:12 -0400 > >>>>Subject: [PATCH] LDAP: warn about lockout option being deprecated > >>>> > >>>>--- > >>>> src/man/sssd-ldap.5.xml | 7 +++++++ > >>>> src/providers/ldap/sdap_access.c | 9 ++++++++- > >>>> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > >>>> > >>>>diff --git a/src/man/sssd-ldap.5.xml b/src/man/sssd-ldap.5.xml > >>>>index > >>>>00da3964af7619f19525e76c4f1292586dd60f54..b46e07fec96ffa7305ab41ce42c16b2e94e53292 > >>>> 100644 > >>>>--- a/src/man/sssd-ldap.5.xml > >>>>+++ b/src/man/sssd-ldap.5.xml > >>>>@@ -1955,6 +1955,13 @@ ldap_access_filter = (employeeType=admin) > >>>> be set for this feature to work. > >>>> </para> > >>>> <para> > >>>>+ <emphasis> > >>>>+ Please note that this option is superseded by > >>>>+ ppolicy option and will be dropped in next > >>>>major > >>>>+ release. > >>>Since we can't remove the option soon, I'd say "might be removed in a > >>>future release". It would also be nice to point the admin to the option > >>>he should be using now instead. > >>OK, I mentioned ppolicy option for the second time, or did you just want me > >>to rephrase the sentence? > >Ah, sorry, no. I was reading the rendered text and didn't realize > >ppolicy was an option and not a generic term. Sorry, can you remove the > >added sentence adn then just enclose ppolicy in <quote> ? That would > >make the rendering better readable I guess. Also, "the ppolicy option". > OK, please see updated patch.
ACK _______________________________________________ sssd-devel mailing list sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel