On 05/27/2015 08:55 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (26/05/15 20:49), Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
On 05/26/2015 07:56 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (26/05/15 13:03), Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
On 05/26/2015 09:25 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
It's better to do not mix utility functions.
So feel free to split file to subfiles if it will be used among many files
or include helper function directly to module. You can later extract helper
function to another utility module when there will be use case.
(run_shell is not used atm)
And here are proposed names. string_utils | utils_string | utils.string,
shell_utils (python already has shutil) ...
Hmm, you asked me to change the "misc.py" name, but now you're suggesting we
should split it. Is it really worth it for three tiny functions? What if we
just rename it to "util.py", or some other name which you find more suitable?
OK, it does not worth to block patches
Thank you :) Would you still like me to rename the file?
Yes, please.
So, should it be "util.py", or something else?
Nick
_______________________________________________
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
