On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 10:07:16AM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (10/03/16 20:37), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >On (10/03/16 20:02), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >>On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 12:53:44PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >>> diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am
> >>> index d6eb0fc..f8111d0 100644
> >>> --- a/Makefile.am
> >>> +++ b/Makefile.am
> >>> @@ -946,6 +946,10 @@ libipa_hbac_la_DEPENDENCIES = 
> >>> src/providers/ipa/ipa_hbac.exports
> >>>  libipa_hbac_la_SOURCES = \
> >>>      src/providers/ipa/hbac_evaluator.c \
> >>>      src/util/sss_utf8.c
> >>> +libipa_hbac_la_CFLAGS = \
> >>> +    $(AM_CFLAGS) \
> >>> +    -std=c90 \
> Actually we shoudl use "-std=c89"
> becuase gcc on rhel6 does not have "c90"
> 
> It has only:
>            c89
>            iso9899:1990
>                Support all ISO C90 programs (certain GNU extensions that
>                conflict with ISO C90 are disabled). Same as -ansi for C code.
> 
>            iso9899:199409
>                ISO C90 as modified in amendment 1.
> 
>            c99
>            c9x
>            iso9899:1999
>            iso9899:199x
>                ISO C99.  Note that this standard is not yet fully supported;
>                see <http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.4/c99status.html> for more
>                information.  The names c9x and iso9899:199x are deprecated.
> 
> and c9x might be to new :-)
> or we might use "iso9899:1990" if "c89" will be too complicated.

Yeah, CI already kicked me out when I submitted the patch with -std=c90 :-)
_______________________________________________
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org

Reply via email to