On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 01:01:03PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote: > On 04/12/2016 12:52 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote: > >On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 12:42:28PM +0100, Pavel Reichl wrote: > >>Hello, > >> > >>Pavel Březina and I have prepared the 1st draft of design document. We > >>mostly focused on summing up its future functionality and its interface. > >> > >>Please comment if you miss some essential functionality or if you would > >>prefer some different interface. > >> > >>Thanks! > >> > >>https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/wiki/DesignDocs/sssctl > > > >One more question.. > > > >The design document talks about: > ># sssctl domain-status $domain [--online, --last-request, --active-server, > >--servers] > >Online status: Online/Offline > >Active server: $currently-conected-server (server status, port status, > >resolver status) > > > >But only main domains have a connection status. How are we going to present > >the subdomain status? Currently we only disable subdomains temporarily if > >they are unreachable. I think it would be nice to display this somehow, but > >I'm not sure if the user would care about our internal status (disabled > >for subdomain, offline for main domain) or if we should display just > >online/offline from the start.. > > If a subdomain is disabled/enabled use offline/online as well?
I think it would be fine, because the user doesn't care about the internals, but cares about the fact, that only cached data can be used at that point. _______________________________________________ sssd-devel mailing list sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
