On Tue, 2016-04-05 at 14:54 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-04-05 at 12:57 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > Thanks, IIRC the int-instead of enum use is intentional, I will look
> > at the others.
> 
> The last coverity/clang thing is a false positive, but I initialized
> reply to NULL anyway, I expect now it will start complaining of possible
> NULL dereference :-)
> 
> Attached find patches that fixes all other issues (hopefully), one of
> them simply dropped an entire function as it turned out I wasn't using
> it.

BUMP ?

Simo.

-- 
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York
_______________________________________________
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org

Reply via email to